Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Robert Watkins <bob@**.NTU.EDU.AU>
Subject: Magic vs Nukes (Was Re: Earthdawn\shadowrn)
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 1993 00:03:00 +0930
[Previous message deleted]
The Deb Decker writes:
>
>I know nothing, nor do I care to know anything about Earthdawn. However,
>why couldn't Nighomnipotent being X cast Transmute ___ to ___ and avoid
>getting hit? Like:
> Transmute Hydrogen to Oxygen/Lead/Pez
> Transmute Plutonium (admittedly a highly processed material) to
> Silly Putty?
>
> Or how about:
> Radiation Barrier 6
> Going completely Astral and going very far away.
> Transmute Rocket to Barney (and terroize the WORLD!!!)
>
>One of the lessons of the NAN-US conflict was: Magic balances out nukes.
>
Hmm... While I almost agree with you, that certainly wasn't a lesson of the NAN
uprising. Nukes may be all powerful weapons, but you don't use them in a civil
war, for some reason...

On the other hand, I do believe that, with sufficent warning, magical
protection could nullify a nuclear attack. How about an army of Air
Elementals/Spirits pushing aside the warheads? A BIG magic fingers picking it
up and flinging it into space? Water elementals/Sea spirits ordered to track
ballistic submarines? And sink them?

How many ways can people think of magically stuffing up a nuke attack??


--
Robert Watkins
bob@******.cs.ntu.edu.au
************ It wouldn't be luck if you could get out of life alive. ***********

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Magic vs Nukes (Was Re: Earthdawn\\shadowrn), you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.