Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: shadowrn@*********.com (corey mitchell)
Subject: makeing char.s
Date: Sun Sep 9 13:45:01 2001
--0-525200723-1000057246=:93511
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

ok i was whondering wich book is best for makeing char.s? SR3 or the companion??/ wich
one is easyest? is there more ways to make char.s other than these books???


---------------------------------
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger.
--0-525200723-1000057246=:93511
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

ok i was whondering wich book is best for makeing char.s?  SR3 or the
companion??/  wich one is easyest?  is there more ways to make char.s
other than these books???<p><br><hr size=1><b>Do You
Yahoo!?</b><br>
Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with <a
href="http://rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/tag/?http://im.yahoo.com/">Yahoo!
Messenger</a>.
--0-525200723-1000057246=:93511--
Message no. 2
From: shadowrn@*********.com (Thorger_SÃŒnert)
Subject: makeing char.s
Date: Sun Sep 9 14:10:01 2001
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_001A_01C1396B.69A3A220
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

----- Original Message -----
>From: corey mitchell
>ok i was whondering wich book is best for makeing char.s? SR3 or the companion??/
wich one is easyest? is there >more ways to make char.s other than these books???

hmh, I would go for the companion ( also I get such an warm and fuzy retrofeeling if I use
the BBB *g*), and to make it easy I would ignore edges and thinks like ghouls,
shapechangers and otakus.
Greetings
Thorger Sünert




------=_NextPart_000_001A_01C1396B.69A3A220
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"
http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2614.3500" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV>----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV>&gt;From: <A
href="mailto:zidane_the_great_leader_of_ff9@*****.com"
title=zidane_the_great_leader_of_ff9@*****.com>corey mitchell</A>
</DIV>
<DIV>&gt;ok i was whondering wich book is best for makeing char.s?&nbsp; SR3
or
the companion??/&nbsp; wich one is easyest?&nbsp; is there &gt;more ways to
make
char.s other than these books??? </DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>hmh, I would go for the companion ( also I get such an warm and fuzy
retrofeeling if I use the BBB *g*), and to make it easy I would ignore edges and
thinks like ghouls, shapechangers and otakus. </DIV>
<DIV>Greetings</DIV>
<DIV>Thorger Sünert</DIV>
<P><BR></P></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_001A_01C1396B.69A3A220--


_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @*****.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Message no. 3
From: shadowrn@*********.com (shadowrn@*********.com)
Subject: makeing char.s
Date: Sun Sep 9 23:05:02 2001
In a message dated 9/9/2001 1:48:03 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
zidane_the_great_leader_of_ff9@*****.com writes:

<< ok i was whondering wich book is best for makeing char.s? SR3 or the
companion??/ wich one is easyest? is there more ways to make char.s other
than these books??? >>

I for one would go with SR3 if you're just starting out. However if you're
more experienced with Shadowrun or with gaming in general you might enjoy the
Companion as it gives a few advanced options that otherwise wouldn't be
available. Also if you're a more advanced player, pick up the Cannon
Companion for it's optional melee combat rules using martial art styles.

Just my .02¥

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about makeing char.s, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.