From: | shadowrn@*********.com (Da Twink Daddy) |
---|---|
Subject: | Matirx Gear Questions and Gripes |
Date: | Sun Jun 9 02:25:00 2002 |
and Matrix memory costs (6nY/Mp or 7.5nY/Mp)? To me it doesn't make sense
that the memory for lap-top sized computers is cheaper than the stuff for
table top computers.
What is with all the junk on page 63 of Matrix? Does anyone actually make
their deckers buy 150nY power cords and 100nY casings (that it takes a test
to add/remove) and remember how much fiberoptic cabling they have for their
Matrix interface? Also, WTF does "add 10 percent to the cost" (p 67 and
170) mean?
IMO, Adding the trace modifiers when chaining matrix connections doesn't
make a lot of sense. Could anyone explain the rationale to me. It makes
more sense to me that a trace would only get the modifier last one
(farthest from the decker). From there, the connection would be dedicated
(and therefore trivial) to trace, but I don't think it would make the
first-tier easier to find.
In general, there doesn't seem like anything interesting on the matrix is
even approachable by someone whose spend less than 150KnY on a deck plus
more on programs. This fails the logic test for me. If there's no way you
can make money with a 30KnY deck, there's not going to be any deckers
around that HAVE 150KnY decks. Could someone paint a scenario in which a
ganger (or any person without Megacorporate funding) becomes a decker?
The stats for the low-end cyberterminals seem to be wrong. I'm pretty sure
there's a rule about not having a persona program higher than your MPCP.
But, low and behold, joe-blow can get a cyber terminal that's 3/5/4/0/0
from any store that sells Sony. Even assuming that the terminal was
"stuck" in Bod/Sensor mode (that is, assuming you use the optional
cyberdeck mode rules...), you'd still only get a 3/4/4/0/0 because you
round down. Plus, there are NO persona stats for the stock cyberdecks
(which, of course, aren't really stock since masking is 2-S illegal, and
without masking they aren't really 'decks). What can you just choose
whatever you want?
How much damage does black hammer do? Is it really based on the security
rating of the host you are on (like black IC) that doesn't seem right,
since it seems like most utilities don't depend on the server. Maybe it
should have multiple multipliers based on damage, like Attack does.
Wizkids has GOT to make rules for running your own host from the shadows.
It would really open up the decker archetype. Small businesses have/rent
them, so they should definately be within the monetary reach of some
shadowrunners. This is quite a bit more complex than it costs X nY for Y
rating, because of bandwidth/usage/load issues (you can't tell be a
100ny/month host could actually handle the same number of users as the
arcology PLTG). The rules certaintly don't have to go into owning an
RTG/LTG or even PLTG, rules for owning a single host would be really nice.
Also, the matrix searching times and modifiers need to be better
normalized. Response Increase 2 shouldn't be the standard for the time
reqs because > 90% of the computers that get used for searching don't have
it. Using the custom cyberterm rules you'll probably end up spending
500KnY for an MPCP 8 deck, the minimum that can run response increase 2.
Also, they shouldn't use "if using response increase 1 or lower"; that's
not a good measure of how fast someone moves in the 'trix. No response
increase + Hot ASIST + DNI + Reality filter is just as fast as Response
increase 2 + Hot ASIST + Datajack.
The rule that teams can only program a utility/IC of rating equal to the
highest Computer (Programming) skill of all the members is stupid. How on
earth do rating 12 and 15 IC get made? From the descriptions of skill
levels in SR3, no one on earth should have a computer skill above 10 and
most programmers aren't going to have one above 8. Teams should be able to
write programs with rating eqals to the highest Computer (Programming)
skill of the group plus one for each member that has at least half (round
up) that skill or SOMETHING believable.
Is there any uppoer limit on the amount of hardening a terminal can have?
>From various rules in the Matrix book, it looks like all firmware code is
automatically adaptive. It often mentions running persona programs at
lower ratings if the MPCP is damaged. I think it even mentions something
like that for response increase. Doesn't it make sense then that the
firmware for stuff like response-increase, ASIST, etc. would work for any
MPCP, or at least any MPCP up to a certain rating and that an MPCP above
that rating could be "turned-down" to work with the old parts. The
mismatched components rule just seems to make it to hard to guadually
upgrade a deck, which is mandatory for a low-/fixed-income decker. There
aren't a lot of runs that net you 500KnY (Enough for a decent 8 MPCP deck,
think much higher for a 10 or 12 [the minimum to get 6d6 matrix
initiative]).
Thinking about the above, couldn't a decker make his firmware
on-adaptive? -2 Rating as an option?
Also, I have a few errata for Matrix, but I guess FanPro isn't reprinting
it yet...
Boyd Stephen Smith, Jr.
bss03@****.edu
ICQ# 514984