Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Rand Ratinac docwagon101@*****.com
Subject: MITS Errata - Hey, Steve, have a look!
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 1999 22:45:32 -0700 (PDT)
> MAGIC IN THE SHADOWS ERRATA
>
> Version 1.0
> Date: 5/19/99
>
> All changes will be reflected in the 2nd corrected printing of Magic
in the Shadows. To determine which printing you have, consult the
notation on p. 5 in the second column after the credits. No indication
means first printing.
<Snippola(TM)>

Steve, where's the errata about replacing the "Karma" stricture with
the updated "Sacrifice" stricture?
==Doc'
(aka Mr. Freaky Big, Super-Dynamic Troll of Tomorrow)

.sig Sauer
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @*****.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com





From docwagon101@*****.com Tue, 8 Jun 1999 22:50:16 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 1999 22:50:16 -0700 (PDT
Message no. 2
From: Ereskanti@***.com Ereskanti@***.com
Subject: MITS Errata - Hey, Steve, have a look!
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 09:52:32 EDT
In a message dated 6/9/1999 12:47:58 AM US Eastern Standard Time,
docwagon101@*****.com writes:

>
> Steve, where's the errata about replacing the "Karma" stricture with
> the updated "Sacrifice" stricture?

It's Rob, not Steve....and ya know what else??? He's right!!! ;-PPP

-K




From JonSzeto@***.com Wed, 9 Jun 1999 10:12:07 EDT
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 10:12:07 EDT
From: JonSzeto@***.
Message no. 3
From: TalonMail@***.com TalonMail@***.com
Subject: MITS Errata - Hey, Steve, have a look!
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 12:38:30 EDT
Rand Ratinac <docwagon101@*****.com>
>Steve, where's the errata about replacing the "Karma" stricture with
>the updated "Sacrifice" stricture?

I'll pass that on to FASA.

S.




From runnerpaul@*****.com Wed, 9 Jun 1999 13:14:07 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 13:14:07 -0400 (EDT)

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about MITS Errata - Hey, Steve, have a look!, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!