Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: s c rose <scrose@****.COM>
Subject: Re: Money management
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 1998 13:00:12 -0600
Robert Watkins wrote:
>
> Panther writes:
> >Gurth wrote:

<Snip the banking stuff>

> This is why a million nuyen will buy you a permanent high lifestyle (10,000
> x 100 for the person who questioned my maths before). You buy the capital
> intensive stuff (house, etc) up front, and leave enough over so that you can
> live off the interest. Any cash management fund will give you enough to live
> off on one million (as it says in Corporate Shadowfiles, it won't make you
> rich(er), though).

Ok who says shadowrunners have to be sinless and broke? I don't see it
anywhere
that someone running the shadows has to be poor. Matter of fact one of
my PC's is
quite rich actually and still runs. The big thing is he picks the runs
he accepts.
It's not about money it's doing the right thing not because some Johnson
offered me
money and I need to pay the rent... You seem to he makes a great deal of
money in
the art of making money and he even spends karma to build the nessary
skills.
He is semi retired from shadowrunning but when push comes to shove he is
still a
shadowrunner and the saying goes you have old runners and bold runner
but few that
are both.

> If you have a character with a million+ nuyen, and they are running solely
> for the money, then you need to examine your character concept again. If you
> have a character with a million+ nuyen, and they are running for some other
> reason, then that's okay.

This is ture and did happen in the game it was even roll played. We
don't need to
run for money but what about makeing a real impact so to speak.


>
--

Never Appeal to a man's "better nature" he may not have one.
Invoking his self-interest gives you more leverage.

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Money management, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.