Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: lordmountainlion@***.rr.com (Scott Peterson)
Subject: Mortars on drones (was Sensor-Enhanced Gunnery) LONG
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 08:37:04 -0700
James said,

snip

>> In the case of a mortar, you could bolt
> > a tube down on a steel lynx and it could quite easily drive around but
when
> > it came time to fire it would launch mortar rounds into the air and drop
> > them randomly around it's location.

My GODs we got a subject i can actualy claim to be an expert on. Gurth Mark
this one down. Sorry for the delay in responses but I was dieing in a VA
Hospital and got back with tons of emails to slog through. I Was for many
years what the United States Army calls an 11c10 Indiret Fire Infantryman.
Read Mortarman. Without going into massive ammounts of non game critical
info, the first and formost issue of the implementtation of a mortar is it
is not fireing randomly. Even a so called 'Hip Shot, or even a direct
Lay/Alignment shot (you want the details of those terms ask) your still
droping shells 'accurately'. The initail reason for developing mortars was
to bridge the gap betrween the massive fire capabilities of Artilery with a
faster response time. You do NOT want HE Proxinty shells landing randomly.

As with every so call hard set of rules there are one or two exceptions. A
'travers and search' fire mission, where you drop a shell traveres a few
turns, drop another and so on is not so much a random shelling of an area as
it is a area supression (armored vehicles and wired guided at missle
crews-and slaughtering of infantry) tactic. The secoond exception is was my
4.2" Heavy Mortar Section called the 'Budwiser' The final protective fire
or FPF is ued when frinedly troops are dug in on the defnseive for a
prepared attack. Think Europe, Cold War Russian Armored Thrust, and the
enemy is bearing down on you. You have all your crew served weapons firing,
your line units are doing 'frag and bags' and then dragon and tow and now
the Javalin (I did work on the optical sight train up in 1987!!!!) Missel
systems are fireing and displaceing and over and over tille they run out of
ammo or are routed. When it hits the fan like this the artilery and mortars
are preset to targets. The LAST target lays all the remaing rounds (I mean
every damn one of them-he smoke-wp-lume-leaflet-whatever you got) anywhere
from 50-100 meters infront of your forward positions in a hope to make a
final stop. Again not random to the trained eye.

Ok so Scotts ramblin on showing off. How does this applie to shadow run?
The massive advances in technology today in the ways of mortars allows for
some interesting uses. The Brits have the Merlin I believe its called, a
medium mortar shell capable of a top attack on a tank. The have rounds
developed for deploying sensors, the knew mini sling shot mines, and thats
just a start. When I saw the way shadowrun developed the heavy weapons and
ammunition i was sorely unimpressed. Haveing Made tarot FireArms for the
net, anyone who has read it can see Im a frikken gun/ammo nut. The biggest
thing that they failed to stress was the fact that mortras are HIGH angel
fire weapons(can you say up over and between buildings in and urban
environ), can be preset for fire missions, with a glid-radio-encry-dcry-comp
system (glid- artilery laser desinator) one man can laze a target and inside
12-18 seconds (depending on how well your gun crew has its ammo prepared)
you have steel flying down range, and finaly have box or rotary magazines
(Russian Vasilik is an example-cant say good its a pos but....). This all
adds up to one thing. WONDERFULL area denial weapon for perimeter
securoty. With all the various forms of ammunition you could creat the
capabilities are endless. This would and does scare me far more than canned
sentry guns any day.

> Except that a hardpoint DOES have an aiming mechanism. I believe it has
> something like 15 degrees of variance, which should probably be more
> than enough if the mortar is set up correctly.

Lesson #2 Mills versus Degrees.

Ok becuase of the exact nature of the way the math is computed for mortars
the standard 360 degrees is not accurate enough for mortar fire. they
developed somethng call Mills. 17. somthing (i cant recall its been 12
years) mills to a degree. Using 17 as a base your looking at just over 250
mills to work with. Thats left to right. I dont have the books or any
ideas since its been while that I looked but you also have to figur ein
elevation and propelent charges. I suppose using the lynxs superio mobility
coupled with the other factors you could get reasnable use for a mortar.

> > In order for a mortar to have any hope of accuracy and dropping rounds
> > within 100 yrds of a target it requires a stable firing platform. If
the
> > base is pushed around every time it launches you can't achieve an
accurate
> > firing solution.

True. Key point, the first round always 'settles the baseplate. Even with
the 4.2" ground mount you cant start super accurate fire untill the bridge
and baseplate are seated. in Built Up Terrain, they teach us to use sand
bags or mechanised carriers. Any vehicle mounted mortas base plate is
usualy on whats called a turntable (commonly referd to that effing pos-cause
it NEVER lines up on a notch you want). And the accuracy you quote may be
by game terms, but a good crew and proper set time can get it down to 50 or
less. Recall the 'Budwiser'

So in summery, a morat on a drone is an excelent capable weapon system that
is highly effect and easily employed. Just make sure your electroics are
shielded.

Scott 'Edge' Peterson

'Why fight when you can hide, why walk when you can ride, go 11 C Go!!!!!!'
Message no. 2
From: Gurth@******.nl (Gurth)
Subject: Mortars on drones (was Sensor-Enhanced Gunnery) LONG
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 19:32:15 +0100
According to Scott Peterson, on Mon, 24 Feb 2003 the word on the street was...

> My GODs we got a subject i can actualy claim to be an expert on. Gurth
> Mark this one down.

Why me specifically? :)

> Lesson #2 Mills versus Degrees.
>
> Ok becuase of the exact nature of the way the math is computed for
> mortars the standard 360 degrees is not accurate enough for mortar fire.
> they developed somethng call Mills. 17. somthing (i cant recall its been
> 12 years) mills to a degree.

There are 6400 mils in a full circle (17.7777... per degree), and the reason
they're used for weapon aiming is because a deflection of 1 mil means the aim
point shifts one meter at 1 km range (IOW, 1-in-1000). Makes the math a lot
easier when figuring out by how much to turn your weapon.

> So in summery, a morat on a drone is an excelent capable weapon system
> that is highly effect and easily employed. Just make sure your
> electroics are shielded.

But what about the recoil? That's pretty much the only point you _haven't_
addressed, and also exactly the thing that was my main objection to the idea
of putting a mortar on a drone :)

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
... just someone who looks like me ...
-> Probably NAGEE Editor * ShadowRN GridSec * Triangle Virtuoso <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Page: http://plastic.dumpshock.com <-

GC3.12: GAT/! d- s:- !a>? C++(---) UL+ P(+) L++ E W--(++) N o? K w(--)
O V? PS+ PE@ Y PGP- t- 5++ X(+) R+++$ tv+(++) b++@ DI- D+ G+ e h! !r y?
Incubated into the First Church of the Sqooshy Ball, 21-05-1998
Message no. 3
From: iridios@********.net (Iridios)
Subject: Mortars on drones (was Sensor-Enhanced Gunnery) LONG
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 20:36:40 -0500
> According to Scott Peterson, on Mon, 24 Feb 2003 the word on the street was...

>>So in summery, a morat on a drone is an excelent capable weapon system
>>that is highly effect and easily employed. Just make sure your
>>electroics are shielded.

Shielded electronics are secure from EMP and other interfering
signals. You probably mean hardened which refers to physical and
electronic durability. A hardened piece of equipment is designed to
resist damage.





--
Iridios
--
Specs from my dream system:
1 dvd thingie
------------------------------------------------------
GCC0.3: y69>?.us[PA] G89 SCP/F/PA:@@[SR] B+>++ f@* RR rm= rr+ l-
m=>- w--->= s=>*:= GM+:+(=):=[PF] h= p!>+ LA= mf+ W+ C--(+) CG- OG+
F= c->= K=(?)
------------------------------------------------------
This email has been verified by no one.
2/24/03
Message no. 4
From: lordmountainlion@***.rr.com (Scott Peterson)
Subject: Mortars on drones (was Sensor-Enhanced Gunnery) LONG
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 22:39:35 -0700
From: "Gurth" <Gurth@******.nl>

There are 6400 mils in a full circle (17.7777... per degree), and the reason
they're used for weapon aiming is because a deflection of 1 mil means the
aim
point shifts one meter at 1 km range (IOW, 1-in-1000). Makes the math a lot
easier when figuring out by how much to turn your weapon.

You know I asked the instructors at the 11c10 school about why and they
never knew. Makes you wonder.

But what about the recoil? That's pretty much the only point you _haven't_
addressed, and also exactly the thing that was my main objection to the idea
of putting a mortar on a drone :)

The main thing here is first off what size of a morat you wanting to mount.
60mm or a 270 mm? With a 60mm low impule mortar (sacrifice standard
tactical combat ranges but still average 1/4 of that) and toss on some gas
shock like on a 4.2", add the 'bridge' from a 4.2, build the tube from a
dense composite or heavel metal to add some basic weight. Then you work the
suspension system of the drone, doesnt matter what kind you tweak it to max.
It wont be cheap but it damn well will be effective. The impression I got
from the string was trying to provide quick indirect high angel fire support
to a team on a run. If you need more than 10 rounds of 60 mm HEPROX to
break out of an engagement and in the process blow a few torsion bars to do
it, then you brought the wrong darn drone. I can continue at leangth if
youd care just some questions or guidence as to which direction.

Scott
Message no. 5
From: lordmountainlion@***.rr.com (Scott Peterson)
Subject: Mortars on drones (was Sensor-Enhanced Gunnery) LONG
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 23:47:54 -0700
From: "Iridios" <iridios@********.net>

> Shielded electronics are secure from EMP and other interfering
> signals. You probably mean hardened which refers to physical and
> electronic durability. A hardened piece of equipment is designed to
> resist damage.

No i was right. If i was going to take this puppy out I'd pulse his ass,
that or get under his minmum range and just sldge hammer the sucker.

Scott
Message no. 6
From: Gurth@******.nl (Gurth)
Subject: Mortars on drones (was Sensor-Enhanced Gunnery) LONG
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 11:16:01 +0100
According to Scott Peterson, on Tue, 25 Feb 2003 the word on the street was...

> You know I asked the instructors at the 11c10 school about why and they
> never knew. Makes you wonder.

Hang on... they teach you how to use something but they don't even know what
it _means_? I'd have expected them to be able to work it out for themselves...

> > But what about the recoil?
>
> The main thing here is first off what size of a morat you wanting to
> mount. 60mm or a 270 mm?

Yeah, like a 270-mm one is going to fit... I take it you do know the size of
vehicle the Russians use for their 240-mm SP mortars? :)

> With a 60mm low impule mortar (sacrifice
> standard tactical combat ranges but still average 1/4 of that) and toss
> on some gas shock like on a 4.2", add the 'bridge' from a 4.2, build the
> tube from a dense composite or heavel metal to add some basic weight.

If you compensate for the recoil by adding weight, then that is going to be
the problem for a drone mounting.

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
... just someone who looks like me ...
-> Probably NAGEE Editor * ShadowRN GridSec * Triangle Virtuoso <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Page: http://plastic.dumpshock.com <-

GC3.12: GAT/! d- s:- !a>? C++(---) UL+ P(+) L++ E W--(++) N o? K w(--)
O V? PS+ PE@ Y PGP- t- 5++ X(+) R+++$ tv+(++) b++@ DI- D+ G+ e h! !r y?
Incubated into the First Church of the Sqooshy Ball, 21-05-1998
Message no. 7
From: elventear@***********.net.pe (Pepe Barbe)
Subject: Mortars on drones (was Sensor-Enhanced Gunnery) LONG
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 10:50:41 -0500
On Mon, 24 Feb 2003 19:32:15 +0100, Gurth <Gurth@******.nl> wrote:

>> So in summery, a morat on a drone is an excelent capable weapon system
>> that is highly effect and easily employed. Just make sure your
>> electroics are shielded.
>
> But what about the recoil? That's pretty much the only point you
> _haven't_ addressed, and also exactly the thing that was my main
> objection to the idea of putting a mortar on a drone :)

Errm. I haven't been following the whole thread. But a Drone with a good
Control System can be made to counter the force of the recoil. That is if
it has the order to stop and stay on that position, and that the force of
the recoil will allow the drone to be on its wheels, which will make the
opposite force to counter the recoil, and the motor of the drone is capable
to counter such force.

I suppose this won't work well with flying drones, which is much harder.

Pepe
Message no. 8
From: lordmountainlion@***.rr.com (Scott Peterson)
Subject: Mortars on drones (was Sensor-Enhanced Gunnery) LONG
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 09:40:28 -0700
From: "Gurth" <Gurth@******.nl>



According to Scott Peterson, on Tue, 25 Feb 2003 the word on the street
was...

>> You know I asked the instructors at the 11c10 school about why and they
>> never knew. Makes you wonder.

>Hang on... they teach you how to use something but they don't even know
what
>it _means_? I'd have expected them to be able to work it out for
themselves...

Notice the 11c10, 11c is the skill identifier, Indirect fire Infantryman.
The 10 is the skill l level. Gopes as high as 6-8 depending on the job. A
Private needs familiarzation with the systems NOT indepth knowledge. As I
said it was atypical for one as young and low ranked to end up in a fire
direction center plotting fire data. I checked mt plotting board and mortar
balistic computer tm's and it isnt even in there. I dont have my Yearly
Skill qualification Test Books but I woukld wager it was in there. And YES
they do at junior enlisted levels teach you to do things and use things and
NOT what they mean. They teach to a standard. Or did I been out since 93.
Your supposed to take the basic info from basic and mos school and get
trained up by your unit. Best commanders and Seargeants get promoted for
their ability to turn thier unit into a highly divers organization.

Example: We had an exercise, the command satf for the platton were in a
meeting and got killed by a sapper. I was an E-4 and ended up runing Fire
Direction Center, the Scetion and essiential 3rd in command. at 18 thats an
eye openr. Got an Army achievement medal for it.

Scott


> > But what about the recoil?
>
> The main thing here is first off what size of a morat you wanting to
> mount. 60mm or a 270 mm?

Yeah, like a 270-mm one is going to fit... I take it you do know the size of
vehicle the Russians use for their 240-mm SP mortars? :)

> With a 60mm low impule mortar (sacrifice
> standard tactical combat ranges but still average 1/4 of that) and toss
> on some gas shock like on a 4.2", add the 'bridge' from a 4.2, build the
> tube from a dense composite or heavel metal to add some basic weight.

If you compensate for the recoil by adding weight, then that is going to be
the problem for a drone mounting.

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
... just someone who looks like me ...
-> Probably NAGEE Editor * ShadowRN GridSec * Triangle Virtuoso <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Page: http://plastic.dumpshock.com <-

GC3.12: GAT/! d- s:- !a>? C++(---) UL+ P(+) L++ E W--(++) N o? K w(--)
O V? PS+ PE@ Y PGP- t- 5++ X(+) R+++$ tv+(++) b++@ DI- D+ G+ e h! !r y?
Incubated into the First Church of the Sqooshy Ball, 21-05-1998
Message no. 9
From: lordmountainlion@***.rr.com (Scott Peterson)
Subject: Mortars on drones (was Sensor-Enhanced Gunnery) LONG
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 09:57:01 -0700
From: "Gurth" <Gurth@******.nl>

Sorry didnt finish, got sideswipped by a nakid redhead.

> The main thing here is first off what size of a morat you wanting to
> mount. 60mm or a 270 mm?

Yeah, like a 270-mm one is going to fit... I take it you do know the size of
vehicle the Russians use for their 240-mm SP mortars? :)

Yes I do but thats the point, refer to previous posts on small 60mm mount
sugestion for area denial syste,.

> With a 60mm low impule mortar (sacrifice
> standard tactical combat ranges but still average 1/4 of that) and toss
> on some gas shock like on a 4.2", add the 'bridge' from a 4.2, build the
> tube from a dense composite or heavel metal to add some basic weight.

If you compensate for the recoil by adding weight, then that is going to be
the problem for a drone mounting.

Ok its NOT THAT much weight but if its such a problem, rip some of that damn
armor off the lynx. The thing about mortars is they dont have to be on the
front lines to be effective. In fact I dont know a single army that daose
that with anything UNDER a 60mm.
Message no. 10
From: ShadowRN@********.demon.co.uk (Paul J. Adam)
Subject: Mortars on drones (was Sensor-Enhanced Gunnery) LONG
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 17:31:13 +0000
In article <004701c2dcee$eb12cc00$c600f218@***.rr.com>, Scott Peterson
<lordmountainlion@***.rr.com> writes
>Ok its NOT THAT much weight but if its such a problem, rip some of that damn
>armor off the lynx. The thing about mortars is they dont have to be on the
>front lines to be effective. In fact I dont know a single army that daose
>that with anything UNDER a 60mm.

British. We issue a 51mm mortar at platoon level. Handheld, hand-aimed,
mostly for instant smoke or illumination but it's got a HE bomb that'll
spoil your day a bit as well.

--
Paul J. Adam
Message no. 11
From: lordmountainlion@***.rr.com (Scott Peterson)
Subject: Mortars on drones (was Sensor-Enhanced Gunnery) LONG
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 11:32:40 -0700
From: "Paul J. Adam" <ShadowRN@********.demon.co.uk>

> British. We issue a 51mm mortar at platoon level. Handheld, hand-aimed,
> mostly for instant smoke or illumination but it's got a HE bomb that'll
> spoil your day a bit as well.
>
> --
> Paul J. Adam
>
Oh yeah forgot about that POS. Might as well isues a M-203 at least you got
full aut fire power and 12 differant ammos to use. Includeing my fave the
buckshot.

Scott
Message no. 12
From: anders@**********.com (Anders Swenson)
Subject: Mortars on drones (was Sensor-Enhanced Gunnery) LONG
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 12:15:48 -0800
> British. We issue a 51mm mortar at platoon level. Handheld, hand-aimed,
> mostly for instant smoke or illumination but it's got a HE bomb that'll
> spoil your day a bit as well.

I bite. What do you do for fire control/aiming at the platoon level?
--Anders
Message no. 13
From: dhyde79@***.net (Derek Hyde)
Subject: Mortars on drones (was Sensor-Enhanced Gunnery) LONG
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 14:20:16 -0600
> I bite. What do you do for fire control/aiming at the platoon level?
> --Anders
>
>
The units I've been in were all armor battalions with one platoon of 120mm
mortars they had one vehicle that worked as the FTC and took the calls from
the command units, you call for fire at a specific grid and the FTC busts
out the map, figures the fire angle and direction, feeds it to the
individual firing vehicles through the computers, then they fire a "test
volley" and if on target are given fire for effect and unleash hell upon
that grid square
Message no. 14
From: loneeagle@********.co.uk (Lone Eagle)
Subject: Mortars on drones (was Sensor-Enhanced Gunnery) LONG
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 20:20:57 +0000
At 03:50 PM 25/2/2003, Pepe wrote:
>>But what about the recoil? That's pretty much the only point you
>>_haven't_ addressed, and also exactly the thing that was my main
>>objection to the idea of putting a mortar on a drone :)
>
>Errm. I haven't been following the whole thread. But a Drone with a good
>Control System can be made to counter the force of the recoil. That is if
>it has the order to stop and stay on that position, and that the force of
>the recoil will allow the drone to be on its wheels, which will make the
>opposite force to counter the recoil, and the motor of the drone is
>capable to counter such force.

There's also the idea of having it "sit down", mentioned before I know but
bear with me here.
If the mortar were mounted correctly it could be carried horizontally and
then deployed (the rear end of the mortar being lowered over the back of
the drone and putting a base plate down.) It makes the weapon slower to
deploy but in the cases it would most likely be used that wouldn't matter.
I'm wondering whether a charge could be used to seat the baseplate in this
case, perhaps simply a mortar round which would "self-destruct" with
minimal fuss prior to paragee (sp?)


--
Lone Eagle
"Hold up lads, I got an idea."

www.wyrmtalk.co.uk - Please be patient, this site is under construction

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GE d++(---) s++: a->? C++(+) US++ P! L E? W++ N o? K? w+ O! M- V? PS+ PE-()
Y PGP? t+@ 5++ X- R+>+++$>* tv b+++ DI++++ D+ G++ e+ h r* y+>+++++
-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----

GCC0.2: y75>?.uk[NN] G87 S@:@@[SR] B+++ f+ RM(RR) rm++ rr++ l++(--) m- w
s+(+++) GM+++(-) A GS+(-) h++ LA+++ CG--- F c+
Message no. 15
From: grimjack@******.com (Martin Little)
Subject: Mortars on drones (was Sensor-Enhanced Gunnery) LONG
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 15:30:35 -0500 (EST)
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Lone Eagle wrote:

> There's also the idea of having it "sit down", mentioned before I know but
> bear with me here.
> If the mortar were mounted correctly it could be carried horizontally and
> then deployed (the rear end of the mortar being lowered over the back of
> the drone and putting a base plate down.) It makes the weapon slower to
> deploy but in the cases it would most likely be used that wouldn't matter.
> I'm wondering whether a charge could be used to seat the baseplate in this
> case, perhaps simply a mortar round which would "self-destruct" with
> minimal fuss prior to paragee (sp?)
>

If you're going to customize it you could probably make some modifications
to the firing system to minimize the recoil, things that you couldn't do
with a man loaded mortar because of the people standing around it.
Message no. 16
From: loneeagle@********.co.uk (Lone Eagle)
Subject: Mortars on drones (was Sensor-Enhanced Gunnery) LONG
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 20:52:27 +0000
At 05:31 PM 25/2/2003, Paul wrote:
>British. We issue a 51mm mortar at platoon level. Handheld, hand-aimed,
>mostly for instant smoke or illumination but it's got a HE bomb that'll
>spoil your day a bit as well.

I thought there was a 2" out there (ok 51mm but 2" is 50.8mm so call it
even :D )


--
Lone Eagle
"Hold up lads, I got an idea."

www.wyrmtalk.co.uk - Please be patient, this site is under construction

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GE d++(---) s++: a->? C++(+) US++ P! L E? W++ N o? K? w+ O! M- V? PS+ PE-()
Y PGP? t+@ 5++ X- R+>+++$>* tv b+++ DI++++ D+ G++ e+ h r* y+>+++++
-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----

GCC0.2: y75>?.uk[NN] G87 S@:@@[SR] B+++ f+ RM(RR) rm++ rr++ l++(--) m- w
s+(+++) GM+++(-) A GS+(-) h++ LA+++ CG--- F c+
Message no. 17
From: Gurth@******.nl (Gurth)
Subject: Mortars on drones (was Sensor-Enhanced Gunnery) LONG
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 10:50:01 +0100
According to Anders Swenson, on Tue, 25 Feb 2003 the word on the street was...

> > British. We issue a 51mm mortar at platoon level. Handheld, hand-aimed,
> > mostly for instant smoke or illumination but it's got a HE bomb that'll
> > spoil your day a bit as well.
>
> I bite. What do you do for fire control/aiming at the platoon level?

Guestimation, AFAIK.

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
Monster zonder waarde
-> Probably NAGEE Editor * ShadowRN GridSec * Triangle Virtuoso <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Page: http://plastic.dumpshock.com <-

GC3.12: GAT/! d- s:- !a>? C++(---) UL+ P(+) L++ E W--(++) N o? K w(--)
O V? PS+ PE@ Y PGP- t- 5++ X(+) R+++$ tv+(++) b++@ DI- D+ G+ e h! !r y?
Incubated into the First Church of the Sqooshy Ball, 21-05-1998
Message no. 18
From: Gurth@******.nl (Gurth)
Subject: Mortars on drones (was Sensor-Enhanced Gunnery) LONG
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 10:53:07 +0100
According to Lone Eagle, on Tue, 25 Feb 2003 the word on the street was...

> I thought there was a 2" out there (ok 51mm but 2" is 50.8mm so call it
> even :D )

Those are two different weapons. The 2-inch mortar is a design from the
1930s that was used in the British army until the late 1970s, by which time
it was replaced by a completely new weapon. This was similar in concept and
overall design but fires different ammunition, so it was called the 51-mm
mortar.

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
Monster zonder waarde
-> Probably NAGEE Editor * ShadowRN GridSec * Triangle Virtuoso <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Page: http://plastic.dumpshock.com <-

GC3.12: GAT/! d- s:- !a>? C++(---) UL+ P(+) L++ E W--(++) N o? K w(--)
O V? PS+ PE@ Y PGP- t- 5++ X(+) R+++$ tv+(++) b++@ DI- D+ G+ e h! !r y?
Incubated into the First Church of the Sqooshy Ball, 21-05-1998
Message no. 19
From: ShadowRN@********.demon.co.uk (Paul J. Adam)
Subject: Mortars on drones (was Sensor-Enhanced Gunnery) LONG
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 17:25:16 +0000
In article <007401c2dd0a$b00abb60$6400a8c0@*********>, Anders Swenson
<anders@**********.com> writes
>
>> British. We issue a 51mm mortar at platoon level. Handheld, hand-aimed,
>> mostly for instant smoke or illumination but it's got a HE bomb that'll
>> spoil your day a bit as well.
>
>I bite. What do you do for fire control/aiming at the platoon level?

Mark One eyeball. Maximum range is only 800 metres, after all: it's a
local asset.
>--Anders
>
>

--
Paul J. Adam
Message no. 20
From: ShadowRN@********.demon.co.uk (Paul J. Adam)
Subject: Mortars on drones (was Sensor-Enhanced Gunnery) LONG
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 17:30:09 +0000
In article <000501c2dcfc$475c5d20$c600f218@***.rr.com>, Scott Peterson
<lordmountainlion@***.rr.com> writes
>From: "Paul J. Adam" <ShadowRN@********.demon.co.uk>
>
>> British. We issue a 51mm mortar at platoon level. Handheld, hand-aimed,
>> mostly for instant smoke or illumination but it's got a HE bomb that'll
>> spoil your day a bit as well.
>>
>> --
>> Paul J. Adam
>>
>Oh yeah forgot about that POS. Might as well isues a M-203 at least you got
>full aut fire power and 12 differant ammos to use.

Full-auto from a M203? You _are_ kidding, right?

You can't lay a decent smokescreen with 40mm grenades, and even a 51mm
HE bomb packs a _lot_ more punch: there's about six times more HE in a
51 bomb than a 40mm grenade.

>Includeing my fave the
>buckshot.

Not a useful mortar load...
>
>Scott
>

--
Paul J. Adam
Message no. 21
From: lordmountainlion@***.rr.com (Scott Peterson)
Subject: Mortars on drones (was Sensor-Enhanced Gunnery) LONG
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 11:21:26 -0700
From: "Paul J. Adam" <ShadowRN@********.demon.co.uk>

> >Oh yeah forgot about that POS. Might as well isues a M-203 at least you
got
> >full aut fire power and 12 differant ammos to use.
>
> Full-auto from a M203? You _are_ kidding, right?

I was refering to the M-16 portion of the weapons system.
>
> You can't lay a decent smokescreen with 40mm grenades, and even a 51mm
> HE bomb packs a _lot_ more punch: there's about six times more HE in a
> 51 bomb than a 40mm grenade.

Pardon me but how did we get mortars and m-203's mixed together?

> >Includeing my fave the
> >buckshot

> Not a useful mortar load...

Who said aything about buck in a mortar. Side out of a mortar i'd use WP

Scott
Message no. 22
From: ShadowRN@********.demon.co.uk (Paul J. Adam)
Subject: Mortars on drones (was Sensor-Enhanced Gunnery) LONG
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 22:28:10 +0000
In article <001401c2ddc3$e0ed3b40$c600f218@***.rr.com>, Scott Peterson
<lordmountainlion@***.rr.com> writes
>From: "Paul J. Adam" <ShadowRN@********.demon.co.uk>
>
>> >Oh yeah forgot about that POS. Might as well isues a M-203 at least you
>got
>> >full aut fire power and 12 differant ammos to use.
>>
>> Full-auto from a M203? You _are_ kidding, right?
>
>I was refering to the M-16 portion of the weapons system.

Guess what? Everyone in the rifle platoon's got... a rifle. Able to fire
full-auto too.

>> You can't lay a decent smokescreen with 40mm grenades, and even a 51mm
>> HE bomb packs a _lot_ more punch: there's about six times more HE in a
>> 51 bomb than a 40mm grenade.
>
>Pardon me but how did we get mortars and m-203's mixed together?

You said you'd prefer the 203. I'm trying to work out why.
>> Not a useful mortar load...
>
>Who said aything about buck in a mortar. Side out of a mortar i'd use WP

Not if you're assaulting through immediately you won't.

--
Paul J. Adam

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Mortars on drones (was Sensor-Enhanced Gunnery) LONG, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.