Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Lady Jestyr <s421539@*******.gu.edu.au>
Subject: Most Prolific People -Mailing List Trivia Again
Date: Tue, 28 May 1996 22:18:13 +1000 (EST)
My apologies. TopCat takes out the award, AFAIK, with about six
screensful of messages...

Lady Jestyr

------------------------------------------------------
I don't have enemies, it's just that my best friends
are trying to kill me.
------------------------------------------------------
Elle Holmes s421539@*****.student.gu.edu.au
http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/1503/
------------------------------------------------------
The opinions expressed are my own, unless you don't
agree with them, in which case they are my evil twin
sister's opinions.









---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 28 May 1996 22:16:51 +1000 (EST)
From: Lady Jestyr <s421539@*****.student.gu.edu.au>
To: Shadowrun Mailing List <shadowrn@********.itribe.net>
Subject: Most Prolific People -Mailing List Trivia


Well, I've just got back to my email account after several weeks away,
and had 1,325 shadowrun messages to go through. *shudder*

Just thought people might like to know that so far the most prolific list
contributors appear to be Sascha Pabst, Mark Steedman, and Gurth. Each
one had sent about four screensful of messages...

Lady Jestyr

------------------------------------------------------
I don't have enemies, it's just that my best friends
are trying to kill me.
------------------------------------------------------
Elle Holmes s421539@*****.student.gu.edu.au
http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/1503/
------------------------------------------------------
The opinions expressed are my own, unless you don't
agree with them, in which case they are my evil twin
sister's opinions.

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Most Prolific People -Mailing List Trivia Again, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.