From: | James Pearley Kilbride <kilbrj@***.EDU> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: MTG was Re: Everyone(almost) who plays Shadowrun is a |
Date: | Mon, 11 Sep 1995 14:52:38 -0400 |
> Subject: MTG was Re: Everyone(almost) who plays Shadowrun is a Munchkin!
> *-------------------------------------------*
> |Stephen M. Bugge|<bugge@********.edu> |
> |President, |<buug@***.com> |
> |College GOP @ SU|<75764.240@**********.com>|
> *-------------------------------------------*
>
>
> On Mon, 11 Sep 1995, Jason Mulligan wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 10 Sep 1995, James Pearley Kilbride wrote:
> >
> > > > >and it's no fun. (I ruled out Magic: the addiction for the same
reason)
> > > MAGIC THE ADDICTION.. I take offence to this because Magic The
gathering has
> > > some very good RPGing lessons if you play it right. True while it
doesn't
> > > require you to actually RPG to play if you do it can be a lot of fun.
Just
> >
> > Hmm...the only lesson I've seen in Magic is that the person with the most
> > money is the toughest. Admittedly, you need a little skill in playing
too.
>
> As a bonafide Magic Junkie, I can agree with both of you. However
> Roleplaying out your deck can get really weird. Lots of cash does not
> equal a tough deck, most of the skill in magic is in deck construction,
> and it is quite possible to build a very good deck with few or no Ultra
> rare out of print super expensive cards.
This is true. But what happens is newbies don't take the time to learn the
intricacies of the existing cheap cards and wow!! over the old stuff that is
worth a lot. Point and case, I created by way of a joke, a green cheap deck,
the hole deck being worth less than 10 dollars and made of all commons and a
couple of really cheap uncommons. I never lost a game with it and played
against numerous decks with single cards worth more than that whole deck.
but anyway wrong listing for this.
see ya,
c/3c Kilbride