Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Cukoo <cukoo@*****.NET>
Subject: MUSH
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 1995 20:19:59 -0700
Hey, I've never tried MUSH but it sounds very interesting. What can you
tell me about it? How do you play? Where are the best ones? Any
information would be good imformation.
Message no. 2
From: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk@************.ORG>
Subject: Re: MUSH
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 1995 00:47:53 -0400
On Mon, 25 Sep 1995, Cukoo wrote:

> Hey, I've never tried MUSH but it sounds very interesting. What can you
> tell me about it? How do you play? Where are the best ones? Any
> information would be good imformation.

There's a good FAQ on MUDs, MUSHes, MUCKs, and the other various
MUD-derived programs -- I think it's simply called the MUD FAQ.
However, there's only one that even comes close to having anything
to do with Shadowrun, and that one's in the ShadowRN FAQ.

---------========== J.D. Falk <jdfalk@************.org> =========---------
| "In case you haven't heard, the Internet is not a superhighway." |
| --Bill Washburn, Internet World, Feb. 1995 |
----========== http://www.cybernothing.org/jdfalk/home.html ==========----
Message no. 3
From: Matt "Egon" Hughes <hughesma@******.luther.edu>
Subject: MUSH
Date: Thu, 2 May 96 20:04:16 CDT
I would like to announce the Shadowrun MUSH, after three years of testing
and programing is finally up and open for biz! Log on and play your
favorite online game in the company of hundreds of other people who like
to blow the drek outta things like you do. Be everything from a Corporate
Exec, dealing dirty deeds to climb the ladder to that Mafia guy who wants to
break you leg to the Underground Rusted Stilleto Ganger who's pushing the
turf. And of course, Shadowrunners, can't forget them:) So telnet to

shadowrun.dnaco.net 4201

Soka?

Castaway@*********.MUSH

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about MUSH, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!