Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: "Gerlof A.Woudstra" <Gerlof.Woudstra@***.PZ.WAU.NL>
Subject: Necronimcons and such
Date: Thu, 6 May 1993 11:35:48 +0100
***** ATTACHMENT: crowley4 *****

On Tue, 4 May 1993, Troy wrote:

>I don't mean to offend you in anyway here,
Ok. none taken. I do not mean to offend you in anyway here either.

>but this subject has a lot to do with making shadowrun magic system
>realistic. The part about Crowley is just about books to avoid when
>doing reasearch on magic.

As was pointed out by others, nowadays magics differs a lot from a world
where magic actually works. I wonder if research is really neccesary.

>Unfortunately we all like to discuss different aspects of the SR system,
>just because you don't see the relevance doesn't mean that it isn't
>important to some of us.

That is true.

>Of course I am not say that you have to read it. You can simply delete the
>mail when it arrive if it is on a topic that you don't like. That is
>one of the reasons why we fill to subject in.

You are correct. But the problem is that I would like to see a good and
downgraded magic system. When I wrote my earlier post, the subjects of
Crowley and necronomicons and such was very hot. I nearly could hear
people shouting "Satanism". What I tried to point out was that IMHO
these things had nothing to do with shadowrun and had nothing to do on
this list.

One last words on these subjects:
If magic doesn't work why wasting your time on it.
If it works, would you really want to deal with nasty stuff like real
spirits, demons and sanity losing books.

I know I don't. The game Call of t'Chulhu said it all. Use magic and go
insane.

The Woodsman (Mighty for my friends)

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Necronimcons and such, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.