Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Wordman wordman@*******.com
Subject: Nerps page?
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 17:21:26 -0400
I know the NERPS is no more, but is there a page that archives the net.books
it produced anywhere?
Message no. 2
From: Adam J adamj@*********.html.com
Subject: Nerps page?
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2000 15:43:06 -0600
At 17:21 6/7/00 -0400, Wordman wrote:
>I know the NERPS is no more, but is there a page that archives the net.books
>it produced anywhere?

http://shadowrun.html.com/nerps

Adam
--
< adamj@*********.html.com / http://shadowrun.html.com/tss >
< ICQ# 2350330 / ShadowFAQ: http://shadowrun.html.com/shadowfaq >
< ShadowRN Assistant Fearless Leader / Shadowrun Creative Resources >
< FreeRPG & Shadowrun Webring Co-Admin / The Shadowrun Supplemental >
Message no. 3
From: Gurth gurth@******.nl
Subject: Nerps page?
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2000 11:25:29 +0200
According to Wordman, at 17:21 on 7 Jun 00, the word on the street was...

> I know the NERPS is no more, but is there a page that archives the net.books
> it produced anywhere?

http://shadowrun.html.com/nerps has them all in different formats, though
I'm not sure how much longer they'll be there.

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
Here come the golden oldies. Here come the Hezbollah.
-> NAGEE Editor * ShadowRN GridSec * Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
->The Plastic Warriors Page: http://shadowrun.html.com/plasticwarriors/<-

GC3.1: GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ UL P L+ E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+
PE Y PGP- t(+) 5++ X++ R+++>$ tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
Incubated into the First Church of the Sqooshy Ball, 21-05-1998

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Nerps page?, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.