Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Csehi Andras <acsehi@*****.ecol.klte.hu>
Subject: New legality
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 1996 12:48:10 +0200 (MET DST)
Sorry for the last mail.
The full question. What does the legality codes mean? For example, Lagality:
3P-E3. I've only the SRII book.
Csehi Andras.
Message no. 2
From: RAY MACEY <r.macey@*******.qut.edu.au>
Subject: Re: New legality
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 1996 13:24:47 +1000 (EST)
On Mon, 22 Jul 1996, Csehi Andras wrote:

> Sorry for the last mail.
> The full question. What does the legality codes mean? For example, Lagality:
> 3P-E3. I've only the SRII book.
> Csehi Andras.
>
I haven't got Shadowtech on me, but from what I can remember, the fist
number is the target number for a cop to 'react' to the item. ie the lower
the number, the more likely to draw heat.

The P part means that you can get a permit (legally or otherwise (10% of
item's cost)) to carry the weapon

The E part, is the category the 'item' belongs to. Mainly important for
determining how long you'll be in jail for, as the sentence is dependant
on the category. Basically useless without the correct sourcebook.


Can anyone else correct or add anything?

Ray.
Message no. 3
From: Csehi Andras <acsehi@*****.ecol.klte.hu>
Subject: Re: New legality
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 1996 10:08:34 +0200 (MET DST)
> I haven't got Shadowtech on me, but from what I can remember, the fist
> number is the target number for a cop to 'react' to the item. ie the lower
> the number, the more likely to draw heat.
>
> The P part means that you can get a permit (legally or otherwise (10% of
> item's cost)) to carry the weapon
>
> The E part, is the category the 'item' belongs to. Mainly important for
> determining how long you'll be in jail for, as the sentence is dependant
> on the category. Basically useless without the correct sourcebook.
>
>
> Can anyone else correct or add anything?
>
> Ray.
>

Thanx. I would try to get this book. I think, this code vary from plex to
plex, and I think, that this code is more important. I've got the Denver
Sourcebook, and this contains the penalties the most common crimes.
Andras.

--------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm new in this list, 'cos I don't have footer.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Message no. 4
From: "Gurth" <gurth@******.nl>
Subject: Re: New legality
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 1996 12:27:22 +0100
Csehi Andras said on 12:48/22 Jul 96...

> Sorry for the last mail.
> The full question. What does the legality codes mean? For example, Lagality:
> 3P-E3. I've only the SRII book.

The last bit (after the dash) indicates the category into which owning or
using the equipment falls. For example, E3 is "Class C Equipment" --
military grade electronics and security equipment. This sets the typical
fines and/or jail sentences you will receive if the cops catch you with
the equipment.

The first number is the TN for those cops to decide whether or not to
hassle you about it; they roll a Police Procedures test with this number
as the TN. Any successes and they will attempt to arrest you for
possession/transporation/use/etc. of the item.

The P in your example indicates that a permit is available to the general
public for the item. Items without a P can be had only on a special
permit available to law enforcement agencies.

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
You can trademark anything you want, as long as you can get someone to
believe it.
-> NERPS Project Leader & Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
-> The Character Mortuary: http://huizen.dds.nl/~mortuary/mortuary.html <-

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version 3.1:
GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ U P L E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+ PE
Y PGP- t(+) 5+ X++ R+++>$ tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about New legality, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.