Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Jordan findlerman@*****.com
Subject: New list domain name
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1999 07:14:55 -0800 (PST)
> I expect to do the list move early next
> week. I even registered a new domain name that I'm going to use
with the
> lists, and I'll work on getting that setup this weekend. The domain
> registration is complete and the root server update should happen
> tomorrow. For those that are interested, how does
shadowrn@*********.org
> grab ya? :-)

Definently easy enough to remember, and catchy enough, and matrix
(internet) related....is this a done deal, or are ya still taking
suggestions?

--JW
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @*****.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Message no. 2
From: Adam J adamj@*********.html.com
Subject: New list domain name
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 1999 09:31:35 -0700
At 07:14 2/4/99 -0800, Jordan wrote:

>> For those that are interested, how does
>shadowrn@*********.org
>> grab ya? :-)
>
>Definently easy enough to remember, and catchy enough, and matrix
>(internet) related....is this a done deal, or are ya still taking
>suggestions?

I figure we'll get maybe 10 suggestions, so -- All suggestions cost you 7
bucks. That way Mark can re-coup the amount he paid for the new domain ;)

In other words: It's a done deal. Sorry folks. (Unless Mark has something
else to say about it..)

-Adam
Message no. 3
From: Mark A. Imbriaco mark.imbriaco@*****.com
Subject: New list domain name
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1999 14:19:02 -0500 (EST)
On Thu, 4 Feb 1999, Jordan wrote:

> Definently easy enough to remember, and catchy enough, and matrix
> (internet) related....is this a done deal, or are ya still taking
> suggestions?

It's a done deal.

-Mark

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about New list domain name, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!