Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: "Robert A. Hayden" <hayden@*******.MANKATO.MSUS.EDU>
Subject: New ShadowTalk List formed.
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1993 08:21:26 -0500
Alright, the new administrative and plot discussion list for ShadowTalk
has been formed.

This is a closed list. Subscriptions are not automatic. You subscribe in
the normal manner of other LISTSERV lists, but it must be approved prior
to becoming official

CONDITIONS:
1) Must be a member of ShadowTalk
2) Must have at least one registered character in the SHADOWTK Cast

---

If you meet these two conditions, you can then submit a subscription
request. To do this, send a mail message to LISTSERV@*****.BITNET (or
LISTSERV@*****.nic.SURFnet.nl) with the following as the first line in the
body:

subscribe plot-d your-real-name

This will cause the listserv to send me a message indicating your desire
to join the list, and providing you meet the two requirements outlines
above, I will add you to the database.

--

Information about the list:

*
* Administrative and Plot Discussions for SHADOWTK
*
* Name= PLOT-D
* Review= Public
* Subscription= By_owner
* Send= Public
* Notify= Yes
* Files= No
* Reply-to= Sender,Respect
* Validate= Store Only
* X-tags= Comment
* Notebook= No
* Stats= Normal,Private
* Errors-To= Owners
* Mail-Via= Dist2
*
* Owner= HAYDEN@*******.mankato.msus.edu Robert Hayden

[> Robert Hayden ____ <] This signature is actually
[> \ /__ <] Odo in disguise.
[> hayden@*******.mankato.msus.edu \/ / <]<----------------------------->
[> aq650@****.INS.CWRU.Edu \/ <] #include <std_disclaimer.h>
--
(GEEK CODE 0.3): GSS d- p--/-p+ c++ l++ m+/* s-/++ g+ w++ t++ r++ x+
[finger my Krypton account for a copy of the Geek Code]

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about New ShadowTalk List formed., you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.