Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: John E Pederson <lobo1@****.COM>
Subject: New Story from Tom Dowd
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 1997 10:38:54 EDT
Did anyone else see the post on rgfc (Wow. Something useful out of
Usenet) about the new story by Tom Dowd? It was posted to FASA's page
recently I guess. It provides a little bit of insight into the goings on
behind the Big D's death, but it doesn't provide anything too earth
shattering, at least not if you've already seen the will and all. Still,
you might find it worth a look.

It's at http://www.fasa.com/Shadowrun/PostMortum

--
-Canthros (Hoo-ray! The list is back!!!)
And ye shall know the truth, and lobo1@****.com
the truth shall set you free. canthros1@***.com
--John 8:32, KJV
http://members.aol.com/canthros1/
Message no. 2
From: Mark Steedman <M.J.Steedman@***.RGU.AC.UK>
Subject: Re: New Story from Tom Dowd
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 1997 08:43:54 GMT
John E Pederson writes

> Did anyone else see the post on rgfc (Wow. Something useful out of
> Usenet) about the new story by Tom Dowd? It was posted to FASA's page
> recently I guess.
I've just seen the story of FASA's web page.

> It provides a little bit of insight into the goings on
> behind the Big D's death, but it doesn't provide anything too earth
> shattering, at least not if you've already seen the will and all. Still,
> you might find it worth a look.
Nothing spectacular provided, confirmation of a few guesses. You do
need to be quite well up on things to understand it as usual but. The
really 'new' thing is the 'resurected' um ok.

> It's at http://www.fasa.com/Shadowrun/PostMortum
I could say a lot more but try reading it, more fun.

Mark

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about New Story from Tom Dowd, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!