Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: lookinglass2002@*****.com (John Doe)
Subject: New to the list and looking for a game...
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 11:38:20 -0800 (PST)
Does anyone do Chat based Shadowrun adventures on a
regular basis? If not then would some of you be
interested in doing so? Computer games still can't
catch the minute details of Role-playing. I used to
play Shadowrun about 5 years ago (as a player and GM)
I would like to get back into a gaming group. Any
suggestions?

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it!
http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/sb/
Message no. 2
From: dv8@*************.com (Dennis)
Subject: New to the list and looking for a game...
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 20:47:41 +0100
> Does anyone do Chat based Shadowrun adventures on a
> regular basis?

I suggest checking out http://forums.dumpshock.com or
http://www.bulldrek.com, both of which do PB3 (Play by Bulletin Board).
Either that or hop on irc.dumpshock.com:6667, channel #shadowrun and
#bulldrek both have some people who are interested in play by chat.

I hope it helps,

Dennis
http://www.wiredreflexes.com
Message no. 3
From: anders@**********.com (Anders Swenson)
Subject: New to the list and looking for a game...
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:05:41 -0800
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 11:38:20 -0800 (PST)
John Doe <lookinglass2002@*****.com> wrote:
> Does anyone do Chat based Shadowrun adventures on a
> regular basis? If not then would some of you be
> interested in doing so? Computer games still can't
> catch the minute details of Role-playing. I used to
> play Shadowrun about 5 years ago (as a player and GM)
> I would like to get back into a gaming group. Any
> suggestions?

http://seattle.darkrelic.net/home.html

--Anders

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about New to the list and looking for a game..., you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.