Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Paul Gettle <RunnerPaul@*****.COM>
Subject: Re: No. [was: Is Bill Clinton a Dragon?]
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1998 12:45:40 -0400
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

At 10:39 AM 9/28/98 -0400, Bryan wrote:
> The plot seems almost worthy o Draconian status. Maybe
someone
>will get some use out of it for a run....
<<Snip: list of dead people>>

If you really think that this is worthy of Draconian status, then most
every upper-tier executive of any triple-A corp in your Shadowrun game
must be a dragon then.

Lots of people gripe about the IEs because at one point FASA tried to
make them responsible for every major advancement in human history,
which discounts the substantial potential to be found in every
"normal" human.

To say "he must really be a dragon" when someone is revealed to
possibly have commited acts that are truely vile and diabolical, ALSO
discounts the substantial potential to be found in every "normal"
human.

I really think you should give humans more credit as to just what we
are really capable of, both good and bad.

End of discussion.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.5.3

iQCVAwUBNg+9MKPbvUVI86rNAQHmBQP/SlXcgYZ2HIC9YASW7uzpA5m0dXu8YGLO
UMG07nblcKEHNQry+kt0gpcsRMqK4UJhphsj5y2GjexD3EFOVeKOwhDf23pE46LT
HI3kfo++OHamCu7Qwygr+oL/FxWhrXkEeHuPjSDSd/qy1W0lviiZWY1OmYjDLGB4
CAa0TkE9yKk=
=+Kpb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
-- Paul Gettle, #970 of 1000 (RunnerPaul@*****.com)
PGP Fingerprint, Key ID:0x48F3AACD (RSA 1024, created 98/06/26)
C260 94B3 6722 6A25 63F8 0690 9EA2 3344

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about No. [was: Is Bill Clinton a Dragon?], you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.