Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: MDB0213@*****.TAMU.EDU
Subject: Null, not Nega (and not complete)
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 93 21:07:11 CET
>Concerning the Nega mage and Nega adept rules posted earlier:

>I like it! They actually have some basis in other SR rules, they make sense,
>and are not too outrageous. Sure, they are very resistant to magic. But:
>a) They are not IMMUNE to magic. It can still have an effect.
>b) They are still vulnerable to other stuff like guns, crashes, etc.

Our group is about to try a new type of character. He is not quite a Nega
(considering that many think that it is an abortion from heck!), but similar.
Since I am only going to be playing him, and didn't really come up with the
rules, I'm going to let my GM post the rules, etc for him. No promises as to
when or if he posts it. This idea is highly experimental, and we will probably
run a couple times before posting information on the type.

BCNU!
---
The Reverend (NEW ADDRESS! mdb0213@****.tamu.edu)
"They called me the Reverend when I entered the church unstained"

aka
Head Shot "A Head Shot a day keeps the Doktor away"

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Null, not Nega (and not complete), you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.