From: | "Robert A. Hayden" <hayden@*******.MANKATO.MSUS.EDU> |
---|---|
Subject: | Ogres |
Date: | Wed, 14 Jul 1993 15:31:47 -0500 |
> Ogres would be slightly stronger than orks, but probably a little dumber.
> How about
> Maximum Bonus
> Ork Orge Ork Orge
> Body 9 9 +3 +3
> Quickness 6 5 -1
> Strength 8 10 +2 +3
> Charisma 5 5 -1 -1
> Intelligence 5 5 -1 -1
> Willpower 6 5
> Reaction 5 5
Hmm, I've alway read Ogres as almost a type of 'giant'. Very strong,
almost lumbering. Dumb as a rock.
(a little AD&D commentary just cuz I remembered it and found it amusing)
Years ago I was playing an Ogre Barbarian (1st ed, to boot).
Gog (to GM): Is this food?
GM: You're hold a rock!
Gog: Can I eat it?
GM: Er . . . no.
Gog: Then I toss it over my shoulder and go find something I CAN eat.
(end commentary)
Anyways, I guess I see them as nothing more than the brick wall between
you and the guy with the gun.
Hmm......
Police (to Ogre): What happened?
Ogre: He shot me with that machine pistol.
Police: Oh, do you want to press charges?
Ogre: Yes, charge him for assault with intent to annoy!
> Ogre's would have Low-Light vision.
Agreed.
> Now about gnomes.....
God I could have fun with these.
{[> Robert A. Hayden ____ hayden@*******.mankato.msus.edu <]}
{[> \ /__ hayden@****.cs.mankato.msus.edu <]}
{[> \/ / aq650@****.INS.CWRU.Edu <]}
{[> #include <std_disclaimer.h> \/ <]}
-=-=-
(GEEK CODE 0.3): GSS d- p--/-p+ c++ l++ m+/* s-/++ g+ w++ t++ r++ x+
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Random Thought:
...we must counterpose the overwhelming judgment provided by consistent
observations and inferences by the thousands. The earth is billions of
years old and its living creatures are linked by ties of evolutionary
descent. Scientists stand accused of promoting dogma by so stating, but
do we brand people illiberal when they proclaim that the earth is neither
flat nor at the center of the universe? Science *has* taught us some
things with confidence! Evolution on an ancient earth is as well
established as our planet's shape and position. Our continuing struggle
to understand how evolution happens (the "theory of evolution") does not
cast our documentation of its occurrence -- the "fact of evolution" --
into doubt.
- Stephen Jay Gould, "The Verdict on Creationism", The Skeptical Inquirer,
Vol XII No. 2
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-