Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Greg Childress <greg@***.EDU>
Subject: Re: Optional Metatypes, part 3: Sasquatch <OT>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 1997 00:59:39 -0400
At 12:02 AM 7/13/97 -0400, you wrote:
>> Well, medically that same condition can arise in humans... that is a
>> person can hear and understand spoken speach perfectly fine, but are
>> almost completely unable to speak coherently. themselves. It had to do
>> with the connections between the parts of the brain for speech and
>> comprehension/cognitive activity (or something... the "Mind, Brain, and
>> Behavior" class that I took was two quarters ago.)
>
>Aphasia (of which there are two kinds, both of which I forget the names
>to. One allows you to understand speech but not produce words sensibly,
>and the other is more or less vice versa.) Not exactly an evolutionary
>advantage for a species to develop, is it?
>
>
Broca's and Wernicke's Aphasia's named after the people who documented the
cases. Not easy to imagine as an evolutionary advantage but then again
neither is the appendix for humans (at least now). Could be vestigial and
improper functioning of a facility that is not used (Prehistoric Awakened
Talking White Shamanic Gorillas next week on Geraldo!)

<greg>
walking the god and worshiping Dog
Shamanic Worldview
or
the dyslexic Delimiter.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Love is not something you can | Greg Childress 0 O
put chains on and throw into | greg@***.edu >
a lake. That's called Houdini | pcstud3@***.edu ----
Love is liking someone a lot. | http://jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu/~child_gp
--------------------------------------------------------------------
When you've seen one non-sequitur, the price of tea in China.
Message no. 2
From: Tim Cooper <z-i-m@****.COM>
Subject: Re: Optional Metatypes, part 3: Sasquatch <OT>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 1997 02:27:49 EDT
On Mon, 14 Jul 1997 00:59:39 -0400 Greg Childress <greg@***.EDU> writes:
>Broca's and Wernicke's Aphasia's named after the people who documented
the
>cases.

Yup... that'd be them. (I even didn't have to go digging through my
notes..)

>Not easy to imagine as an evolutionary advantage but then again
>neither is the appendix for humans (at least now). Could be vestigial
and
>improper functioning of a facility that is not used.

Well, if Sasquatch don't communicate verbally (or just in some very
removed method) then it would make sense.

>(Prehistoric Awakened Talking White Shamanic Gorillas next week on
Geraldo!)

IIRC the WHITE "sasquatch" don't seem to have much difficulty talking to
humans.. especially over the topic of dinner. :)

~Tim

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Optional Metatypes, part 3: Sasquatch , you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.