Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Gurth gurth@******.nl
Subject: [OT] A rant about rounding off that I need to get off my chest...
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 13:09:58 +0200
According to Rand Ratinac, at 21:12 on 17 Oct 99, the word on the street
was...

> The pound to kg conversion is more accurate if you
> multiply by 0.4536, rather than dividing by 2.2.

<rant>

Hasn't anybody in the imperial-to-metric-conversion world heard of
significant digits (or whatever the concept is called in English)? There's
no point in multiplying by a factor of 0.4536 if you only know the mass in
whole pounds -- your overall accuracy will only be as good as the part of
the conversion that has the lowest accuracy. One digit more is usually
handy, so you can round off afterward, but more than that is unnecessary.

In other words, saying that 10 lbs (2 significant digits) equals 4.536 kg
(4 significant digits) is nonsense; 4.5 kg (2 significant digits) is as
accurate as you can get. Now if you'd measured the 10 lbs to be _exactly_
10.000000 lbs (8 significant digits), then you could say it equals 4.536
kg (4 significant digits), but you can't say it's 4.5360000 (8 significant
digits) because the lowest accuracy is now in your multiplication factor.
Thus, in most cases, dividing by 2.20 is accurate enough.

For those who think the above is too complicated, do it like this: round
off to whatever is normal in what you're measuring in. If you measure body
weight, in countries using imperial measurements you would round off to
whole pounds. So, when converting to kilograms, you round to the nearest
kilo. Nobody says "I weigh 74.285 kg" -- rather, they'll tell you they
weigh 74 kg.

</rant>

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
"Remember that all the items in the equipment lists are obviously
not available anywhere." --Gemini RPG, p. 100
-> NAGEE Editor * ShadowRN GridSec * Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
->The Plastic Warriors Page: http://shadowrun.html.com/plasticwarriors/<-
-> The New Character Mortuary: http://www.electricferret.com/mortuary/ <-

GC3.1: GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ UL P L+ E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+
PE Y PGP- t(+) 5++ X++ R+++>$ tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
Incubated into the First Church of the Sqooshy Ball, 21-05-1998
Message no. 2
From: Rand Ratinac docwagon101@*****.com
Subject: [OT] A rant about rounding off that I need to get off my chest...
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 22:31:21 -0700 (PDT)
> > The pound to kg conversion is more accurate if you
> > multiply by 0.4536, rather than dividing by 2.2.
>
> <rant>
<BigSnip(TM)>
> </rant>
> Gurth@******.nl

Gurth...

Get a life.

8-)

I wasn't saying that you SHOULD use that. I was just
saying that it's a more accurate conversion, in case
people WANT that kind of accuracy. Fair 'nuff?

*Doc' boggles at someone who can get that worked up
over maths..."What are you, an ACTUARY?!?!"*

====Doc'
(aka Mr. Freaky Big, Super-Dynamic Troll of Tomorrow)

.sig Sauer
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about [OT] A rant about rounding off that I need to get off my chest..., you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.