Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: David Buehrer <dbuehrer@******.CARL.ORG>
Subject: Re: [OT] Cybertorso and genitals
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 1997 07:57:56 -0700
Barbie wrote:
/
/ At 11-Dez-97 wrote Simon T. Sailer:
/
/ >When a cybertorso is implanted, are the characters genitals just
/ >removed as the picture in cybertech implies? Are they repaced by
/ >metal (nice thought), or are they left where they are, just covered
/ >by a metal plate that can be removed on demand? (really nice thought)
/ >If I look at the picture, I'd vote for option 1, but that surely had
/ >some impact on the characters further life...
/
/ 3. removeable plate(s) 1000-Y-

"Bomb-bay doors open. Bombs away!"

:)

I'm sorry. I couldn't resist.

-David
--
"Creativity is allowing yourself to make mistakes.
Art is knowing which ones to keep."
--
http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/1068/homepage.htm
Message no. 2
From: "J. G. du Chatinier" <chatin@*******.NL>
Subject: Re: [OT] Cybertorso and genitals
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 1997 18:00:20 +0100
At 07:57 11/12/1997 -0700, you wrote:

<<<KASNIPPA!!>>

>
>"Bomb-bay doors open. Bombs away!"
>
>:)
>
>I'm sorry. I couldn't resist.

Oh dear.
Oh dear oh dear.

On another note, this _could_ be the lay-up to ultimate safe-sex. ;)

Jod
chatin@*******.nl
Message no. 3
From: Gurth <gurth@******.NL>
Subject: Re: [OT] Cybertorso and genitals
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 1997 20:12:56 +0100
David Buehrer said on 7:57/11 Dec 97...

> / 3. removeable plate(s) 1000-Y-
>
> "Bomb-bay doors open. Bombs away!"

Isn't that more useful for the back side? :)

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html - 5044116
N.B. Please do not read the lyrics while listening to the recordings.
-> NERPS Project Leader & Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Page: http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/plastic.html <-
-> The New Character Mortuary: http://www.electricferret.com/mortuary/ <-

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version 3.1:
GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ U P L E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+ PE
Y PGP- t(+) 5++ X++ R+++>$ tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Message no. 4
From: The Bookworm <Thomas.M.Price@*******.EDU>
Subject: Re: [OT] Cybertorso and genitals
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 1997 20:16:43 -0600
On Thu, 11 Dec 1997, J. G. du Chatinier wrote:
> >"Bomb-bay doors open. Bombs away!"
> Oh dear. Oh dear oh dear.

for the replace with metal option i think the quote
"Stay on Target, Stay on Target..." would be more aprapo:)
Message no. 5
From: "Leszek Karlik, aka Mike" <trrkt@*****.ONET.PL>
Subject: Re: [OT] Cybertorso and genitals
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 1997 03:21:17 +0000
On 13 Dec 97, The Bookworm disseminated foul capitalist propaganda by
writing:

> On Thu, 11 Dec 1997, J. G. du Chatinier wrote:
> > >"Bomb-bay doors open. Bombs away!"
> > Oh dear. Oh dear oh dear.
>
> for the replace with metal option i think the quote
> "Stay on Target, Stay on Target..." would be more aprapo:)

"Luke, at that speed, will you be able to pull out in time?"

Uhh... Nevermind.


Leszek Karlik, aka Mike - trrkt@*****.onet.pl; http://www.wlkp.top.pl/~bear/mike;
Star Wars fan and Amber junkie; FIAWOL; WTF TKD TOO;
FL/GN Leszek/Raptor II/ISD Vanguard, (SS) (PC) (ISM) {IWATS-IIC} JH(Sith)/House Scholae
Palatinae
Umm...your ZIP is open...
Message no. 6
From: Lort Gob <teunissen@***.NL>
Subject: Re: [OT] Cybertorso and genitals
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 1997 12:40:48 +0100
>> > >"Bomb-bay doors open. Bombs away!"
>> > Oh dear. Oh dear oh dear.
>>
>> for the replace with metal option i think the quote
>> "Stay on Target, Stay on Target..." would be more aprapo:)
>
>"Luke, at that speed, will you be able to pull out in time?"
>
>Uhh... Nevermind.
>
Use the Force....:)

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about [OT] Cybertorso and genitals, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.