Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: robertennew@*****.com.au (Robert Ennew)
Subject: (OT) cyberzombie and astral sight (Long)
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 15:49:19 +1100 (EST)
--- "Timothy J. Lanza" <tjlanza@************.com>
wrote:
> At 11:47 PM 11/18/2003, Robert Ennew wrote:
> > --- Max Noel <maxnoel_fr@*****.fr> wrote: > > I'm
> >going to alow her to see aura's but not astral
> > > space.
> > > > But it stil does not answer my question do
> spirts
> > > and elementals have
> > > > aura's?.
> > >
> > > Of course they do. Every living being has
> an aura.
> > > (and some dead
> > > beings such as cyberzombies have auras too)
>
> [Snip All!]
>
> You've just summed up the entire point and the
> entire question of
> cybermancy. At what point is dead really dead? The
> cybermancy procedure's
> entire point is to ward of physical death when your
> spirt says you /should/
> be dead.
>
> Cyberzombies are not dead, but they should be.
>
> All rules are out the window. (Rules meaning
> "in-world" rules.)

Timothy J. Lanza, Who's post are you directing your
above comment at, Max Noel or Robert Ennew (me)? I
just want to clarify because I get the feeling from
the [snip all!] In reference to what I had taken the
time to type, you were actually refering to Max Noel's
prior post.

In the case that you were refering to Max Noel's post
exclusively could you trim my name from your reply (If
what's irrellevent why even make mention of It?), as I
don't know whether to be insulted by the [snip all!]
ridiculing what I typed or my entire post was snipped
to save bandwidth.

GZ :)

http://personals.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Personals
New people, new possibilities. FREE for a limited time.
Message no. 2
From: tjlanza@************.com (Timothy J. Lanza)
Subject: (OT) cyberzombie and astral sight (Long)
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 00:11:15 -0500
At 11:49 PM 11/23/2003, Robert Ennew wrote:
> --- "Timothy J. Lanza" <tjlanza@************.com>
> > You've just summed up the entire point and the
> > entire question of
> > cybermancy. At what point is dead really dead? The
> > cybermancy procedure's
> > entire point is to ward of physical death when your
> > spirt says you /should/
> > be dead.
> >
> > Cyberzombies are not dead, but they should be.
> >
> > All rules are out the window. (Rules meaning
> > "in-world" rules.)
>
>Timothy J. Lanza, Who's post are you directing your
>above comment at, Max Noel or Robert Ennew (me)? I
>just want to clarify because I get the feeling from
>the [snip all!] In reference to what I had taken the
>time to type, you were actually refering to Max Noel's
>prior post.
>
>In the case that you were refering to Max Noel's post
>exclusively could you trim my name from your reply (If
>what's irrellevent why even make mention of It?), as I
>don't know whether to be insulted by the [snip all!]
>ridiculing what I typed or my entire post was snipped
>to save bandwidth.

My apologies. It was to save bandwidth. Your point was right on target, and
the reply was pretty much an agreement. Cybermancy is all about finding the
limits of life, death, and the spirt and then breaking them.

--
Timothy J. Lanza
"When we can't dream any longer, we die." - Emma Goldman

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about (OT) cyberzombie and astral sight (Long), you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!