Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: David Buehrer <dbuehrer@******.CARL.ORG>
Subject: Re: [OT] Dvixen's FAQs
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 1998 15:04:36 -0700
Panther` wrote:
/
/ David Buehrer wrote:
/ >
/ > HAUPT ULRICH FB08 wrote:
/ > /
/ > / All newbies (and it won't hurt the veterans):
/ > /
/ > / Try wordman`s FAQ located at :
/ > /
/ > / http://pobox.com/~wordman/ShadowFAQ.html
/ >
/ > Wrong FAQ. Wordman's is for Shadowrun in general. The ShadowRN FAQ
/ > for the list is at Dvixen's site.
/ >
/ > http://coastnet.com/~dvixen/shadowrun/srfaq1.html
/
/ Hate to disappoint you, but that url's not quite right. Here's the real
/ one:
/
/ http://www.coastnet.com/~dvixen/shadowrn.html

<checks Dvixen's .sig from a recent post>

Dvixen, fix your sig. ...Please? :)

-David
--
"Write it on your heart that every day is the best day of the year"
- Ralph Waldo Emerson
--
http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/1068/homepage.htm
Message no. 2
From: Dvixen <dvixen@********.COM>
Subject: Re: [OT] Dvixen's FAQs
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 1998 19:44:21 -0800
David Buehrer wrote:
> / Hate to disappoint you, but that url's not quite right. Here's the real
> / one:
> /
> / http://www.coastnet.com/~dvixen/shadowrn.html
>
> <checks Dvixen's .sig from a recent post>
>
> Dvixen, fix your sig. ...Please? :)

Waht .sig? i lost it suring the upgrade, and haven't bothered to make a new
one. I type it in every time I post, so it bloody well better be right.

And the proper url for the FAQ is :
http://coastnet.com/~dvixen/shadowrn/srnfaq1.html

Tah-dah!

*grumble* I'm going back to sleep. I hate the flu.

-Dvixen
FAQ Flunky fo the ShadowRN and SRCard mailing lists.
(url above.)

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about [OT] Dvixen's FAQs, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.