Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: DV8 dv8@***.nl
Subject: [OT] Fasa website..again [was: Maps in Shadowrun]
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 22:11:54 +0100
----- Original Message -----
From: "NeoJudas" <neojudas@******************.com>
> Maybe when the FASA website is redone (chuckle/mirth/laugh)

What I've heard is that Mike told someone at Spiel'00 this weekend in Essen
that there would be some serious work on the Fasa website...but then again,
we've heard that before.

Regards,

DV8

"Abashed the Devil stood, and felt how awful Goodness is,..."
- John Milton, Paradise Lost
Message no. 2
From: Mark Imbriaco mark.imbriaco@*****.com
Subject: [OT] Fasa website..again [was: Maps in Shadowrun]
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 16:40:55 -0500 (EST)
On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, DV8 wrote:

> > Maybe when the FASA website is redone (chuckle/mirth/laugh)
>
> What I've heard is that Mike told someone at Spiel'00 this weekend in Essen
> that there would be some serious work on the Fasa website...but then again,
> we've heard that before.

Yep. To be honest, however much I'd like FASA to have a more powerful,
easier to navigate, more feature rich web site, I want Shadowrun product
more. FASA knows that the website is a problem, and they intend to
address it -- it's just the /when/ that's the question. With the
release schedules that they have for next year, it's even less of a
priority, I'd suspect.

-Mark

--
"The big question is whether the planet will disappear in the twinkling of
an eye. It is astonishingly unlikely that there is any risk - but I could
not prove it." - John Nelson

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about [OT] Fasa website..again [was: Maps in Shadowrun], you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.