Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Bull <chaos@*****.COM>
Subject: [OT] Gargoyles vs. King of the Hill
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 1998 18:38:02 -0400
My apologies... this is strictly off topic, and not much of a redeeming
quality to it for a couple lists here, but...

USA Weekend, a weekly insert in a lot of US Newspapers is running a TV Toon
Showdown, with Gargoyles vs. King of the Hill.

I know we have a few gargoyle fans here, and over on the Gargoyles Mailing
List, we're trying to not only get the Gargs to win. but break the record
of 69% for most votes for a show. We're at 67%, and need some more to push
it over...

So... if you like the Gargoyles Cartoon :] Goto www.usaweekend.com and
vote! :]

Bull -- Expecting to get yelled at about this :]

--
Bull -- The Best Ork Decker You Never Met
chaos@*****.com ===== bull22@***********.com
http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Cavern/3604

=======================================================
= =
= Order is Illusion! Chaos is Bliss! Got any Fours? =
= =
=======================================================

"Can the Gummi Worms really live in peace with the Marshmallow Chicks?"
-- Pinky, "Pinky and the Brain"
Message no. 2
From: Bai Shen <baishen@**********.COM>
Subject: Re: [OT] Gargoyles vs. King of the Hill
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 1998 22:56:53 -0400
> I know we have a few gargoyle fans here, and over on the Gargoyles Mailing
> List, we're trying to not only get the Gargs to win. but break the record
> of 69% for most votes for a show. We're at 67%, and need some more to push
> it over...

68% actually.-grin-
--
Bai Shen
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
http://www.series2000.com/users/baishen
UIN 3543257 (Don't ask to join if you aren't going to send me anything.)

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about [OT] Gargoyles vs. King of the Hill, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!