Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: shadowrn@*********.com (J. Keith Henry)
Subject: (OT-Humor) Re: Cybercombat
Date: Mon Jan 29 13:55:01 2001
From: "Nexx" <nexx@********.net>
Subject: Re: Cybercombat


> I'll bow to superior experience in this, then.... I'll admit freely that I
> haven't played since 2nd edition, and then we didn't use deckers, except
as
> plot devices (the team's job was to get the decker in and wait tensely as
I
> described his brain dribbling on the floor).

Dribbling???? You know, there is this new bit of fluffware out there I've
heard of that solves that little problem. I believe it was called "the
Decker Diaper" or some such. Makes it possible to ensure that the dying
deckers (and I believe it had counterpart merchandise available for astrally
functional as well as other simsense related fields) don't leave an
unsightly and possibly even unseemly mess behind in the moment of their
untimely demise.

Last I knew MCT sold the latest fashion versions of it, but word on the
'nets claims that Vashon has joined forces with Gold-Coast Customwear (a
subsidiary of Aztechnology) to come up with a veritable /killer/ new line.
I think they even offer it in mood-swing and damage-determining
color-chromatic patterns that determine the "condition" of the wearer and
alter their fashion-line accordingly.

Where'd I hear about this??? Well I was at this photo-shoot with Rudolph
and Honey Bunny the other day, and Honey Bunny was trying to explain how the
color combos worked in conjunction with her glow-in-the-dark <censored
material here> and Rudolph was saying he actually liked the color-evolving
beacon effect....
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
J. Keith Henry ("K" "NeoJudas") (don't ask... it isn't safe to ask
;-)
Hoosier Hacker House (http://hoosierhackerhouse.com/)

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about (OT-Humor) Re: Cybercombat, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.