Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: David Buehrer <dbuehrer@******.CARL.ORG>
Subject: Re: [OT] Is it me....
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 1997 06:58:10 -0700
Dvixen wrote:
/
/ Spike wrote:
/
/ > Don't miss me too much, I'll only be gone for 2 weeks.
/ > (Unless the phase II TA training kills me)
/
/ Good luck! (And maybe they'll teach you that OT is bad... ;)

<caveman/soldier> OT good.. PT bad. </caveman/soldier) ;)

-David
--
"Creativity is allowing yourself to make mistakes. Art is knowing
which ones to keep."
--
http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/1068/homepage.htm
Message no. 2
From: Dvixen <dvixen@********.COM>
Subject: Re: [OT] Is it me....
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 1997 16:18:55 -0800
> DVIXEN! NOW YOU SHOULD KNOW BETTER THAN THAT! Nobody, and I mean
> nobody, is allowed to talk about "marmota monax" on this list! And
> especially about them lil' varmints woodchucking!

I hear buzzing. Anyone hear buzzing? Damn, that buzzing is annoying.

> Ile drewna moglby nalupac swistak, jezeli swistak moglby lupac
> drewno?

No. Tha bheil thu searubh an diugh?

> > FAQ Flunky of the SRcard and ShadowRN Mailing Lists
>
> FAQ flunky, eh?

You say taht as if you have never head of the FAQ before. Hrm. Guess that
means you better read it.

(I've been way to quiet lately. People are going to have to actually ask
where the FAQ's are. This cannot be allowed to happen!)

--

Dvixen Code-word : Weevil-chuck. dvixen@********.com
Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si
marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
FAQ Flunky of the SRcard and ShadowRN Mailing Lists
http://coastnet.com/~dvixen/shadowrn/srnfaq1.html <= Get it. Memorize!
Required Reading => http://coastnet.com/~dvixen/srtcg/tcgfaq1.html
Message no. 3
From: Spike <u5a77@*****.CS.KEELE.AC.UK>
Subject: Re: [OT] Is it me....
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 1997 00:22:43 +0000
And verily, did David Buehrer hastily scribble thusly...

|<caveman/soldier> OT good.. PT bad. </caveman/soldier) ;)

I think I can agree with you there...

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|u5a77@*****.cs.keele.ac.uk| Windows95 (noun): 32 bit extensions and a |
| | graphical shell for a 16 bit patch to an 8 bit |
|Andrew Halliwell | operating system originally coded for a 4 bit |
|Principal Subjects in:- |microprocessor, written by a 2 bit company, that|
|Comp Sci & Electronics | can't stand 1 bit of competition. |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|GCv3.1 GCS/EL>$ d---(dpu) s+/- a- C++ U N++ o+ K- w-- M+/++ PS+++ PE- Y t+ |
|5++ X+/++ R+ tv+ b+ D G e>PhD h/h+ !r! !y-|I can't say F**K either now! :( |
Message no. 4
From: "Leszek Karlik, aka Mike" <trrkt@*****.ONET.PL>
Subject: Re: [OT] Is it me....
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 1997 20:28:10 +0000
On 25 Nov 97, Dvixen disseminated foul capitalist propaganda by
writing:

> > DVIXEN! NOW YOU SHOULD KNOW BETTER THAN THAT! Nobody, and I mean
> > nobody, is allowed to talk about "marmota monax" on this list! And
> > especially about them lil' varmints woodchucking!
>
> I hear buzzing. Anyone hear buzzing? Damn, that buzzing is annoying.

Naaah. Me ain't hearing no buzzing...

> > Ile drewna moglby nalupac swistak, jezeli swistak moglby lupac
> > drewno?
>
> No. Tha bheil thu searubh an diugh?

Ellean thaeilu noeh taraghael.
Slaan.

> > > FAQ Flunky of the SRcard and ShadowRN Mailing Lists
> >
> > FAQ flunky, eh?
>
> You say taht as if you have never head of the FAQ before. Hrm. Guess
> that means you better read it.

FAQ? Seems like a swear word to me...
;P

And no, I haven't read the FAQ. </HTML>

(Attachment converted: c:/disclamer.crd)
Disclaimer: I sometimes lie.


Leszek Karlik, aka Mike - trrkt@*****.onet.pl; http://www.wlkp.top.pl/~bear/mike; FIAWOL
FL/GN Leszek/Raptor II/ISD Vanguard, (SS) (PC) (ISM) {IWATS-IIC} JH(Sith)/House Scholae
Palatinae
The cost of living is killing me!

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about [OT] Is it me...., you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.