Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Bull <chaos@*****.COM>
Subject: [OT] Mailers, once again (was Re: TO SCOTT KELLEY (mainly) [OT])
Date: Sun, 4 May 1997 23:48:23 -0500
At 01:41 AM 5/5/97 +0100, Avenger wrote these timeless words:

>Pegasus is very simple to set up for signatures, and handles them
>properly, I don't know about Eurdora.
>
Eudora is cake to use, and HIGHLY recommended, especially now that 3,01
LITE is available (though the full version is well worth it).

My .sig files are set up as text files, which are pasted onto the end of
every mail I send out. it's automaticly done, and the only way Eudora
sends attachments is if you specifically tell it to send a file as an
attachment, so no mistakes there.

Also, With Lite you can have 2 different sigs, and there's a menu right
above your workspace that you can choose which .sig you want to us, or
choose <none> which doesn't send a sig at all. With the full version you
can have as many sigs as you want (I have like 6, for various mailing
lists. This one is my standard though).

Eudora also has some great filtering options, a spell checker (full only),
and some other great features. It also automatically does word wrapping
(both coming in and going out), is very simple to use, and is the best
mailer (imnsho) that I've found...

Get it if you can use it (available for Mac and IBM).

<<and no, I don't work for Eudora...:)>>

Bull
--
Now the Offical Celebrity Shadowrn Mailing List Welcome Ork Decker!
Fearless Leader of the Star Wars Mailing List
NEW HOME PAGE!: http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Cavern/3604/home.html

Bull, aka Steven Ratkovich, aka Rak, aka a lot of others! :]

"The best Ork Decker you never met"
-Me, in the upcoming "Target: UCAS" Shadowrun Sourcebook!

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about [OT] Mailers, once again (was Re: TO SCOTT KELLEY (mainly) [OT]), you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.