Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: K in the Shadows <Ereskanti@***.COM>
Subject: (OT) Media Preferences (Re: About the RBB images on HHH)
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 23:34:57 EST
In a message dated 1/15/1999 8:02:52 PM US Eastern Standard Time,
Schizi@***.COM writes:

>
> > This is actually similar to a problem TSR had - for those of you who
aren'
> t
> > familiar with their website, on it they provide quite a few Dragon
> magazine
> > articles free to download. However, they can't provide the old stuff,
> > because the writers hold copyright over it and they can't get in touch
> with
> > the writers.
> >
> Though they are producing a CD that conatins all the old dragons.
> They got around the above problem, by reprinting the issue exactly, with
ads
> and all. Since they own the rights to the magazine or some such....
> For your review :-)

Sadly, that isn't quite working out according to plan there guy, there are
more troubles forthcoming.

-K
Message no. 2
From: K in the Shadows <Ereskanti@***.COM>
Subject: (OT) Media Preferences (Re: About the RBB images on HHH)
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 23:36:50 EST
In a message dated 1/15/1999 8:33:45 PM US Eastern Standard Time,
Schizi@***.COM writes:

>
> > That include those old "Wormy" and "SnarfQuest" comics?
only reason I'd
by
> > the dang thing.
> Yes they will actually scan in the whole issue piece by piece, so
everything
> is included

Actually, it is situations containing these comics, and a few others, that
have them at odds the most. It has to do with my changing the subject line
and what form the contracts exist within.

-K

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about (OT) Media Preferences (Re: About the RBB images on HHH), you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.