Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: paul@*********.demon.co.uk (Paul Squires)
Subject: [OT] Message Order
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 17:16:24 +0000
Is it just me or is anyone else getting the messages (especially the How
about it? Thread) in completely the wrong order - my mail software is
putting the thread right but I seem to be getting replies to messages
I've not got)

Maybe it's just the sheer amount of traffic causing problems :)
--
Paul Squires
paul@*********.demon.co.uk
Message no. 2
From: mamos@*****.com (Mike Amos)
Subject: [OT] Message Order
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 10:18:04 -0700
I thought maybe that was just me. I keep seeing replies to messages I
haven't gotten yet, I thought maybe I was just losing my mind

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Squires [mailto:paul@*********.demon.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 10:16 AM
To: shadowrn@*****.dumpshock.com
Subject: [OT] Message Order


Is it just me or is anyone else getting the messages (especially the How
about it? Thread) in completely the wrong order - my mail software is
putting the thread right but I seem to be getting replies to messages
I've not got)

Maybe it's just the sheer amount of traffic causing problems :)
--
Paul Squires
paul@*********.demon.co.uk
Message no. 3
From: davidb@****.imcprint.com (Graht)
Subject: [OT] Message Order
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 10:30:41 -0700
At 10:18 AM 12/19/2002 -0700, Mike Amos wrote:
>I thought maybe that was just me. I keep seeing replies to messages I
>haven't gotten yet, I thought maybe I was just losing my mind
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Paul Squires [mailto:paul@*********.demon.co.uk]
>Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 10:16 AM
>To: shadowrn@*****.dumpshock.com
>Subject: [OT] Message Order
>
>
>Is it just me or is anyone else getting the messages (especially the How
>about it? Thread) in completely the wrong order - my mail software is
>putting the thread right but I seem to be getting replies to messages
>I've not got)
>
>Maybe it's just the sheer amount of traffic causing problems :)

It's probably being caused the overall high internet traffic due to the
typical last-minute Xmas shopping blitz here in the US. Lots of people are
shopping online, lots of credit card transactions are being made, and lots
of employees are surfing because work is slowing down and/or they would
rather be on vacation right now.

When this happens email sometimes gets delayed at various points along the
internet, so the message emails arrive out of order.

At least that's why I think it's happening <shrug>.

<Admin>

FYI, would the new members please place their replies below/after quoted
posts? Thank you :)

</Admin>

--
To Life,
-Graht
ShadowRN Assistant Fearless Leader II
http://www.graht.com
Message no. 4
From: paladinu@****.com (paladinu@****.com)
Subject: [OT] Message Order
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 18:42:34 -0600
-----Original Message-----
From: Graht [mailto:davidb@****.imcprint.com]
At 10:18 AM 12/19/2002 -0700, Mike Amos wrote:
>I thought maybe that was just me. I keep seeing replies to messages I
>haven't gotten yet, I thought maybe I was just losing my mind
----/Original Message-----

Yeah the list is still pretty messed up and it isn't just Yahoo or
Hotmail. I have tried subscribing with a few different accounts and
still seem to miss entire parts of threads. I am always surprised when
I look in the archives and see whole slews of things missing. Also, if
it helps in troubleshooting, I am getting the digest form.

BTW HAPPY 2064 EVERYONE! HOPE IT"S A GOOD ONE!

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about [OT] Message Order, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.