Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: NaCl(aq) jed7466@******.isc.rit.edu
Subject: [OT] Message timing (Was Re: Extra Cyberarms)
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 12:08:52 -0400
Does anyone else get this problem? I sort messages by date, so I can read them
in chronological order. But Simon Fuller's last post came through as being date
2/10/00 5:04 am. Is there something wrong on my end, or should Simon rest his
clock? Just wondering . . . :)

--
NaCl(aq)
-------------
GCS(GAT) d>d-- s-:- a-->a? C++++ S E W+>W++ w PS? PE Y+ R+ tv-@ b+ DI+++ G
e>e+++ h>h+ r--- !y+**
Message no. 2
From: Strago strago@***.com
Subject: [OT] Message timing (Was Re: Extra Cyberarms)
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 16:17:40 -0400
"NaCl(aq)" wrote:

> Does anyone else get this problem? I sort messages by date, so I can read them
> in chronological order. But Simon Fuller's last post came through as being date
> 2/10/00 5:04 am. Is there something wrong on my end, or should Simon rest his
> clock? Just wondering . . . :)
>

It always happens with me as well. And always Simon Fuller's posts. Well, Al's
posts always come after the ones replying to his as well, but that's just cuz he's
so silly :^).

>
> --
> NaCl(aq)
> -------------
> GCS(GAT) d>d-- s-:- a-->a? C++++ S E W+>W++ w PS? PE Y+ R+ tv-@ b+ DI+++ G
> e>e+++ h>h+ r--- !y+**

--
--Strago

All Hail Apathy! Or don't. Whatever. -abortion_engine

SRGC v0.2 !SR1 SR2+ SR3++ h b++ B- UB- IE+ RN+ SRFF W+ sa++ ma++ ad+ m+ (o++ d+)
gm+ M P
Message no. 3
From: Simon Fuller sfuller@******.com.au
Subject: [OT] Message timing (Was Re: Extra Cyberarms)
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 10:51:04 +1000
-----Original Message-----
From: NaCl(aq) <jed7466@******.isc.rit.edu>
To: shadowrn@*********.com <shadowrn@*********.com>
Date: Tuesday, April 18, 2000 2:57 AM
Subject: [OT] Message timing (Was Re: Extra Cyberarms)


Does anyone else get this problem? I sort messages by date, so I can read
them
in chronological order. But Simon Fuller's last post came through as being
date
2/10/00 5:04 am. Is there something wrong on my end, or should Simon rest
his
clock? Just wondering . . . :)

--
NaCl(aq)


-sigh- It's me. Or to be more exact, my fiance, who changes the calendar so
she can use some shareware with an expiry date. I think I only stuffed up
with one post, I realised seconds after sending it. I am getting better at
catching it before I annoy everyone who sorts by date, but for all those
other times, I just have to apologise and live with the hate.
Message no. 4
From: NaCl(aq) jed7466@******.isc.rit.edu
Subject: [OT] Message timing (Was Re: Extra Cyberarms)
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 21:03:39 -0400
Simon Fuller wrote:

>
> -sigh- It's me. Or to be more exact, my fiance, who changes the calendar so
> she can use some shareware with an expiry date. I think I only stuffed up
> with one post, I realised seconds after sending it. I am getting better at
> catching it before I annoy everyone who sorts by date, but for all those
> other times, I just have to apologise and live with the hate.

Ok. Just checking. And . . .um. . .why not just pay the five bucks for the
shareware, or find the registration code online?



--
NaCl(aq)
-------------
GCS(GAT) d>d-- s-:- a-->a? C++++ S E W+>W++ w PS? PE Y+ R+ tv-@ b+ DI+++ G
e>e+++ h>h+ r--- !y+**

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about [OT] Message timing (Was Re: Extra Cyberarms), you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!