Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: John E Pederson <lobo1@****.COM>
Subject: Re: [OT, more or less] something Ive really wanted
Date: Thu, 25 Dec 1997 23:19:07 -0500
On Thu, 25 Dec 1997 22:01:29 -0600 The _Astral _Watch-Dude
<elfman@*****.NET> writes:

<<I still can't believe I let you'all know my first name1 now you can
track me with Ritual sorcery.>>


Hey, that's your own fault. True Names can be a ... uh, bear, yeah:)


<<Wait a minute, no you can't. Thats only in MY house rules that you can
use someone's first name as a ritual link.Oh no! Now yall will use that
to find me and thwap me good!!!=)>>


Why? What did you do this time? :) 'Sides, that would require the
manathwap spell... I don't anybody other than Caric (currently in
absentia) ever learned that...


>> Makes things a lot clearer, doesn't it?
>Very much clearer.


New info does that:) Merry Christmas, Tyrell:)

BTW, a couple quick ideas for your random magician table: group all the
elemental adepts in one category (you could set up a second table to
contain the four types, with 2 numbers set as rerolls) and replace the
three open slots with anything that got left out or had to be moved (like
the entry for '1' :)

--
John Pederson Canthros, the-SR-book-deficient shapeshifter-mage
(only got Target UCAS for Xmas this year:/ )
<<-------------------------------------------------------------->>
I had rather believe all the fables in the legends and the Talmud
and the Alcoran, than that this universal frame is without a mind.
--Francis Bacon
<<-------------------------------------------------------------->>
lobo1@****.com canthros1@***.com john.e.pederson@***********.edu
http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Lair/4864 ICQ UIN 3190186

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about [OT, more or less] something Ive really wanted, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.