Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Kevin White <kevw@*****.CO.UK>
Subject: Re: [OT] My Shadowrun group's latest exploits...
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 1997 13:35:22 +0000
> >>
> >> His name was Adam Weishaupt.
> >>
> >I know this name, wasn't he the origional leader of the Bavarian
> >Illuminati (or something like that - need to checkl my notes at home).
>
Did a quick riffle and this was the man I was thinking about. 1st May
1776, I think that was the date.

Diamond
Message no. 2
From: "Fisher, Victor" <Victor-Fisher@******.COM>
Subject: Re: [OT] My Shadowrun group's latest exploits...
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 1997 09:22:33 -0500
Kevin White said:
>> >> His name was Adam Weishaupt.
>> >>
>> >I know this name, wasn't he the origional leader of the Bavarian
>> >Illuminati (or something like that - need to checkl my notes at home).
>>
>Did a quick riffle and this was the man I was thinking about. 1st May
>1776, I think that was the date.


What's in store for my players:

1) Is Adam Weishaupt much more than the victim he seems?

2) There IS much more to Marta's story about her confrontation with
The Dutchman, that killed her partner, and left her in the hospital.

3) Why did Gerik give the twins the invitations to the party, and
what's his stake in the scheme of things?

4) Why did Control REALLY warn the twins off from their
confrontation with Sleezy?

5) What was that whole conversation Kohl had with the man in Prague,
and why did he shoot him? <evil GM chuckle>
Message no. 3
From: Kevin White <kevw@*****.CO.UK>
Subject: Re: [OT] My Shadowrun group's latest exploits...
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 1997 14:33:57 +0000
[...8<... Nightmare player schedule]

Sounds ace! <evil grin>

Diamond

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about [OT] My Shadowrun group's latest exploits..., you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!