Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: iridios@********.net (Iridios)
Subject: [OT] Nonsense sigs? (was: Re: Perverted lizards of the 6th world?)
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 20:41:57 -0400
Phillip Gawlowski wrote:
> Am Wed, 11 Jun 2003 11:59:42 +0200 hat Steve Garrard <SteveG@****
> systems.co.za> geschrieben:

>
>> **********************************************************************
>> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
>> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
>> are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
>> the system manager.
>>
>> This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
>> MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
>>
>> www.mimesweeper.com
>> **********************************************************************
>
>
> You know that the above is none-sense? Especially Paragraph 1?

It's not considered nonsense when you realize that he is sending
mail from what appears to be an account provided by his employer.
If I sent mail from mine, it would have something similar attached.


--
Iridios / http://iridios.bravepages.com

Top ten reasons to visit my new site:
9. Because it's there.
------------------------------------------------------
GCC0.3: y69>?.us[PA] G89 SCP/F/PA:@@[SR] B+>++ f@*
RR rm= rr+ l- m=>- w--->= s=>*:= GM+:+(=):=[PF] hp!>+ LA= mf+ W+ C--(+) CG-
OG+ F= c->= K=(?)
------------------------------------------------------
This email has been verified by no one.
6/11/03

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about [OT] Nonsense sigs? (was: Re: Perverted lizards of the 6th world?), you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.