Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Rune Fostervoll <runefo@***.UIO.NO>
Subject: [OT] Re: Dikote
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 1998 21:55:48 GMT
Micheal Feeney wrote:
>Bsszzt. wrong answer.
Is this a game show of some sort?

Okay. 1-0 to Bryan C.

Thanks for playing.

>I suppose if you really wanted to be a summbridge, you could rule it does
>that, IN YOUR CAMPAING. but its not gonna happen in any campaing of mine.

What is a summbridge? I'm rather curious - it's a new word to me.
I don't think I really want to be one, but hey, I might. I tried figuring out
what it means - I strongly suspect it's meant as a derogatory term of sorts, but
it holds little meaning. The closest match I can think of is as a misspelled
onomatepoeticon for saying 'son of a bitch', which is not very suitable, IMO.

As for your other point, of course you are correct. I would not say what
you should do in your campaign. I apologize if I gave that impression.
I mean that.

A little disclaimer:
I am not sure you quote me up there, but I've said something similar, so it goes
for me too. You quote far too little and with the standard 'you write' tag
which is meaningles.

Regards,
Fade

--

ADVICE, n. The smallest current coin.
-Ambrose Bierce
Message no. 2
From: Micheal Feeney <Starrngr@***.COM>
Subject: Re: [OT] Re: Dikote
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 1998 18:34:13 EDT
In a message dated 98-10-20 17:56:44 EDT, you write:

<< A little disclaimer:
I am not sure you quote me up there, but I've said something similar, so it
goes
for me too. You quote far too little and with the standard 'you write' tag
which is meaningles.

Regards,
Fade
>>

cant really be helped, the "you write" quoter is part of the AO-Hell mail
software and cant be easily changed. and your also right about the
summabrige, I started to write something else and decided to .... ummm...
keep my language clean, so to speak.

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about [OT] Re: Dikote, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!