Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Bull <chaos@*****.COM>
Subject: [OT] Re: hello
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 1998 05:21:45 -0500
At 01:40 AM 1/18/98 -0600, Wyrmy wrote these timeless words:
>Am i ,Lady J,And kristling The only ones awake?I always thought Bull
>did'nt need sleep,and that gurth was on continous caffeine,so where is
>everbody?
>
I'm here kid... Just doing other stuff tonight... I need another 24 hours
this weekend, but doesn;t look like I'll get it, so... I get to work :]

BTW: I DO sleep... Just not half as often as I should...:]

Bull
--
Bull, aka Steven Ratkovich, aka Rak, aka Chaos, aka a lot of others! :]

The Offical Cuddly Celebrity Shadowrn Mailing List Welcome and Archive
Answer Ork Decker!
Fearless Leader of the Star Wars Mailing List
List Flunky of ShadowCreations, creators of the Newbies Guide,
---- in production now!
HOME PAGE: http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Cavern/3604/
NEW!!!! UIN: 6460938

"Wait a minute! First you break up with me, and now you want to sleep with
me?? What are you... A GUY??"
-- Michael J. Fox on "Spin City"
Message no. 2
From: Adam J <fro@***.AB.CA>
Subject: [OT] Re: hello
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 1998 18:25:10 -0700
At 15:53 18/01/98 +0000, you wrote:
>And verily, did Leszek Karlik, aka Mike hastily scribble thusly...
>|You know that you're addicted to e-mail when:
>|- You check your e-mail. You get a "you have no new mail" message. So
>|you check it again. ;P
>
>A WHAT message? What's one of those then?

Windows email clients pop up a message like that, because some people just
have to be told everything.. ;)

-Adam
-
http://shadowrun.home.ml.org \ TSS Productions \ The Shadowrun Supplemental
ShadowRN Assistant Fearless Leader \ AdamJ@******** \ fro@***.ab.ca
The Shadowrun Archive Co-Maintainer: http://www.interware.it/shadowrun

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about [OT] Re: hello, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.