Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Scott W <see_scott_run@*****.COM>
Subject: [OT]Re: Laser Weapons
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1998 10:20:52 -0800
<snip>

> The answer to the original question, though, is not
> given anywhere in the SSC or FoF. I would imagine
> them being pulse lasers, as these are AFAIK
> easier to make and a lot less energy-hungry than
> continuous-beam lasers.

Uh, I hate to reveal my net-speak naivety, but just
what the heck does the acronym AFAIK mean? I've
puzzled through any others I've seen, but this one
eludes me...

Scott
==

"If you can't win, don't join them;
learn how to lose."
-Walt Kelly

_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @*****.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Message no. 2
From: Adam J <adamj@*********.HTML.COM>
Subject: Re: [OT]Re: Laser Weapons
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1998 11:36:55 -0700
At 10:20 12/13/98 -0800, Scott W wrote:

> Uh, I hate to reveal my net-speak naivety, but just
>what the heck does the acronym AFAIK mean? I've
>puzzled through any others I've seen, but this one
>eludes me...

As Far As I Know.

-Adam
--
< http://shadowrun.html.com/tss / adamj@*********.html.com >
< ShadowRN Assistant Fearless Leader / TSA Co-Admin / ICQ# 2350330 >
< FreeRPG & Shadowrun Webring Co-Admin / The Shadowrun Supplemental >
< ShadowFAQ: http://shadowrun.html.com/shadowfaq >

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about [OT]Re: Laser Weapons, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!