Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Adam J adamj@*********.html.com
Subject: [OT] Re: New ShadowCreations Name..
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 1999 01:29:17 -0700
At 19:35 2/26/99 -0600, dghost@****.com wrote:

>>The new mailing list should go operational next week.
>
>You picked Shadowrun: Hints, Ideas, and Tips, didn't you? I know you did
>... Fess up. ;)

I would sooner stab myself in the eye repeatedly with the exacto knife I
have sitting here than willingly label anything I was about to start work
on as shit.

Things I have completed or abandoned can get that label, though.

-Adam
--
< http://shadowrun.html.com/tss / adamj@*********.html.com >
< ShadowRN Assistant Fearless Leader / TSA Co-Admin / ICQ# 2350330 >
< FreeRPG & Shadowrun Webring Co-Admin / The Shadowrun Supplemental >
< ShadowFAQ: http://shadowrun.html.com/shadowfaq >
< "She pretty much walks around perpetually pissed at Mick." >
< - Kevin Kelly, on professional wrestler Mick Foleys wife Colleen >
Message no. 2
From: Steven A. Tinner bluewizard@*****.com
Subject: [OT] Re: New ShadowCreations Name..
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 01:19:17 -0500
>>You picked Shadowrun: Hints, Ideas, and Tips, didn't you? I know you did
>>... Fess up. ;)
>
>I would sooner stab myself in the eye repeatedly with the exacto knife I
>have sitting here than willingly label anything I was about to start work
>on as shit.
>
>Things I have completed or abandoned can get that label, though.

Liar! You LOVE that name!
Admit it!
Admit it or I'll slap you in a Figure Four Leglock so fast you won;t be able
to say "Please Nature Boy don't hurt me!"

;-)

Steven A. Tinner
bluewizard@*****.com
http://listen.to/Tinner
"9 points for word usage, and a cookie for using the term "Gygaxian
Whore"."

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about [OT] Re: New ShadowCreations Name.., you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!