Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: NightLife <habenir@******.SAN.UC.EDU>
Subject: OT Re: When Spike's away, the children will play...
Date: Sun, 4 May 1997 18:14:47 -0400
>And once I realised how *out of control* the OT posting was, I stopped.
>Pity everyone cannot do the same. (In fact, I seriously doubt you could,
>Nightlife. Feel free to prove me wrong.) And for those wondering, April
>1 was the last OT posting I made.

No I'll got way before that and use the worst spam this list has seen the
woodchuck. You were part of that if you don't like it well bite me.

>Marty, no my mood has not improved.
>
>Czar, you want OT in the subject, you put it there. Right after someone
>tells me how this thread has less to do with the purpose of this list
>than Fargo, Princess Bride, or mailer discussions.
>
>End of discussion, as far as I am concerned. See you kids in about a
>month.

Bye now, Bye, bye, ciao.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Nightlife Inc.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Ah at last! The TRANSFORMATION is complete!
For YEARS they mocked me! They took the name EMMANUEL LEWIS in vain!
But tonight RETRIBUTION will be mine!
For I am REBORN as --WEBSTER--, The adorable scamp of DOOM!
Ma'am's and Georges beware Webster walks the earth and he's got a
HANKERIN' for some SPANKERIN'!

Man did I nail this mad doctor routine or WHAT?
"Deadpool #4"

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Document Classified
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Message no. 2
From: Ullrich Jans <ujans@*******.POND.INKA.DE>
Subject: [OT] Re: When Spike's away, the children will play...
Date: Thu, 8 May 1997 03:11:39 +0200
Czar Eggbert <czregbrt@*********.EDU> writes:

[lots of quoted text snipped]

> I'm sorry but I Have to ....
> Where's the (OT) in YOUR subject heading? :):):)

Well.. and in yours? ;-)

BTW.. did you lose your cutters? ;-)

SCNR, Ulli

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about [OT] Re: When Spike's away, the children will play..., you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.