Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: shadowrn@*********.com (Mark Imbriaco)
Subject: [OT] RE: WTF???????
Date: Wed Jan 31 23:25:01 2001
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, TexasFriedCriminal wrote:

> i apologize should anyone have felt offended.

Here comes the part where ae waxes eloquent about how he's not offended
and how nothing online can offend him. Come on, AE, let us have it! :)

-Mark

--
"The big question is whether the planet will disappear in the twinkling of
an eye. It is astonishingly unlikely that there is any risk - but I could
not prove it." - John Nelson
Message no. 2
From: shadowrn@*********.com (DV8)
Subject: [OT] RE: WTF???????
Date: Thu Feb 1 01:10:01 2001
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Imbriaco" <mark.imbriaco@*****.com>
> > i apologize should anyone have felt offended.
>
> Here comes the part where ae waxes eloquent about how he's not offended
> and how nothing online can offend him. Come on, AE, let us have it! :)

Cheap shot! Cheap shot!...but funny. :)

DV8

"Abashed the Devil stood, and felt how awful Goodness is,..."
- John Milton, Paradise Lost
Message no. 3
From: shadowrn@*********.com (abortion_engine)
Subject: [OT] RE: WTF???????
Date: Sat Feb 3 11:30:11 2001
From: "Mark Imbriaco" <mark.imbriaco@*****.com>
> On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, TexasFriedCriminal wrote:
> > i apologize should anyone have felt offended.
>
> Here comes the part where ae waxes eloquent about how he's not offended
> and how nothing online can offend him. Come on, AE, let us have it! :)

What, and be predictable? ;) Well, let's see...

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about [OT] RE: WTF???????, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.