| From: | Wildfire@*************.com Wildfire@*************.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [OT] SCA etc. (was: You might be an online gamer) |
| Date: | Tue, 11 Jul 2000 18:05:51 GMT |
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 05:53:35 -0700 (PDT)
From: Raveness Ravensbane <ravenessravensbane@*****.com>
Subject: RE: You might be an online Shadowrun gamer if. . .ot
To: shadowrn@*********.com
Reply-To: shadowrn@*********.com
<SNIP>
> Why didn't you just say SCA? (Well, that's what it
> sounds like <grin>)
>
> While swords and cloaks are easier to do and wear,
> there's so much more you
> can do with one of those victorian gowns (design
> wise). Always wanted to try
> my hand a making one.
Believe me, its not worth the effort and material. "I need 10 yards of heavy brocade
just for the skirt?! Aarghh!" I stick with my Kimonos and hakamas, occasionally a
T-tunic. And its not cloaks and _swords_. Its cloaks and _rapiers_. _Armor_ goes with
the swords (or sometimes bows). ^_^
> Because it got really messy last time I mentioned Free
> Masonry. And I'm a Rainbow Girl and Eastern Star
> member. Not SCA.
> And I belive you mean Elizabethan over Victorian.
> Different queens.
Definitly Elizabeth. Victoria's out of period. As for messy, that's usually because Free
Masonry is a lot like Mao (the card game). Nobody's allowed to answer all your questions.
:)
+We'll answer all your questions about SCA, anytime, though, and love to have you join
us!+ <whack>
Sorry, about that rude interruption from the Chatelaine of Stierbach. Back to your
regularly scheduled Shadowrun...
Wildfire (aka Kazetani-sama Kiyotora)
Terminally Behind SOTA
