Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Paul Gettle <RunnerPaul@*****.COM>
Subject: Re: [OT] Serious Barrier Rating Question
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 1998 12:36:31 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

At 11:59 AM 11/14/98 +0100, you wrote:
>Maybe, maybe not. I think it would be best to base this on body
_weight_
>rather than Body Rating -- fat people have more flesh that needs to
be
>penetrated than thin people...

This reminds me of an episode of "Cops" I saw one time. The cops had
been called in to respond to a 911 call about a drive-by-shooting. To
make a long story short, they caught the shooters fairly quickly, and
the shooters said they'd only fired on one person. The cops then went
around the neighborhood, looking for the shooting victim, who had been
a 250 pound teenager.

They caught up with the fat guy 2 blocks down. He hadn't even realized
he'd been shot, and was rather surprised when the police pointed out
the hole in his shirt. However, when they examined him without the
shirt on, the police found no entry wound at all. The police
determined that because the shooters were using such a small caliber
round (a .22 if I remember right) that the bullet had just bounced
right off the fat guy.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.5.3

iQCVAwUBNk2/maPbvUVI86rNAQEMcAQAmq+KSwg975QGrPArCwElF0mEmHca2fWP
w2WULf6cWBvxdXKC5CkV/oWKzDJ6yjii5RxF255HEubtJCY4gdi4DrcIupNO+/mz
h94q/nUb9/+x0fBuQgU4XYKNl2VUXgv27x4m7BKn0lihsLbzpRuouGwRZxMX8txG
u1BneN8sFzE=
=w3UG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
-- Paul Gettle, #970 of 1000 (RunnerPaul@*****.com)
PGP Fingerprint, Key ID:0x48F3AACD (RSA 1024, created 98/06/26)
C260 94B3 6722 6A25 63F8 0690 9EA2 3344

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about [OT] Serious Barrier Rating Question, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.