Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: "Arno R. Lehmann" <arlehma@***.NET>
Subject: [OT] ShadowRN Guru. was Re: C-12 at 4m
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 1997 00:58:16 +0100
On Thu, 13 Feb 1997 12:06:38 +0100, Gurth wrote:

>To clear this up ONCE AND FOR ALL (yeah, right...)
> -> NERPS Project Leader & Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
>-> The Plastic Warriors Page: http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/plastic.html <-

Are you now officail Shadowrun Guru or what????

But: You're right. So you may be official SR Guru anyway. But them
Guru, please note: I was right too.

So all you others out there: on your knees.

:):):)


--
Arno
*********************************************************************
Be careful when replying to this mail - check the address !!!
(And send me a note when you notice that
the reply-to-address points to the list!)
*********************************************************************
Message no. 2
From: Gurth <gurth@******.NL>
Subject: Re: [OT] ShadowRN Guru. was Re: C-12 at 4m
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 1997 12:53:40 +0100
Arno R. Lehmann said on 0:58/14 Feb 97...

> > -> NERPS Project Leader & Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
> >-> The Plastic Warriors Page: http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/plastic.html <-
>
> Are you now officail Shadowrun Guru or what????

_UN_official. FASAMike's the only official guru as far as I'm concerned,
seeing how he works for FASA...

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
Watching re-runs on my TV.
-> NERPS Project Leader & Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Page: http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/plastic.html <-

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version 3.1:
GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ U P L E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+ PE
Y PGP- t(+) 5+ X++ R+++>$ tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about [OT] ShadowRN Guru. was Re: C-12 at 4m, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!