Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Bull <chaos@*****.COM>
Subject: Re: [OT] SR Monopoly
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 1997 20:57:18 -0500
At 06:14 PM 1/20/97 -0700, you wrote:
>| To bring this back to SR... If tehy ever made a SR monopoly game, what
>| would it be like? And waht would you use for properties, playing pieces,
>| etc...?
>
>Let me see, for playing pieces I would go for the
>steriotypical SR team (elf decker, female mage, NA shaman,
>troll sam, etc). Or you could go the abstract route
>(cyberdeck, Seatle space needle, Ares Predator, drone,
>etc). And a third option could be to use major characters
>(Harly, Dunk, Damion, etc.).
>
You could probably use some of the Ral partha SR minis for pieces...

>For properties, start off with glow city and the barrens,
>and work your way up to the space station (rent for that
>one's gotta be a bitch :)
>
Cool... Could be interesting...

Let's consider working on this... Maybe Mike will like the idea...:)

<big cheesy grin at FASAMike>

>Hmmm.. I'll have to scrounge up a monopoly board and give
>this one some thought.
>
I'll see what I can come up with too...:)

>-David-who-can't-believe-he's-taking-this-seriously
>
Why not... It wouldn't be the stupidest thread to hit this list...:)

Bull-the-gods-are-we-starting-another-one-now?-ork-decker


--
Bull-the-cuddley-Kojack-imitating-Star-Wars-lovin'-ork-decker

=======================================================
= Bull, aka Chaos, aka Rak, aka Steven Ratkovich =
= chaos@*****,com =
= "Order is Illusion! Chaos is Bliss! Got any fours?" =
=======================================================

Less than 2 weeks till Star Wars!

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about [OT] SR Monopoly, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.