Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: caric caric@********.com
Subject: [OT uh, duh]RE: Raiders of the Lost Woodchuck
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 14:21:32 -0700
> From: shadowrn-admin@*********.com
> [mailto:shadowrn-admin@*********.com]On Behalf Of Bull
> Sent: Friday, July 28, 2000 11:41 AM

> ><saunters in and sits down next to Caric and grins gleefully>
> >
> <pulls out his "spare" key to the backdoor (that no one knew
> Bull installed
> last time he visited) and plops down between Caric and David...>
>
> Heya guys! How's life? :]

Hmmmmm, well the problem that we are running into here is that most of
the original culprits are lumped together in the same place. One well
placed carp and we're all done for.

Ahhh well at least we'll be twapped in good company.

Caric-the-"HEY-that's-my-chair-Bull!"-shaman
Message no. 2
From: Bull bull@***********.com
Subject: [OT uh, duh]RE: Raiders of the Lost Woodchuck
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 18:01:58 -0400
At 02:21 PM 7/28/00 -0700, caric wrote:
>
>Ahhh well at least we'll be twapped in good company.
>
>Caric-the-"HEY-that's-my-chair-Bull!"-shaman
>
hey Caric, hand me some Dew and some Pixie Sticks, and the cahir is yours.
Otherwise... I'm bigger than you :]

Bull


____________NetZero Free Internet Access and Email_________
Download Now http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
Request a CDROM 1-800-333-3633
___________________________________________________________
Message no. 3
From: caric caric@********.com
Subject: [OT uh, duh]RE: Raiders of the Lost Woodchuck
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2000 01:16:58 -0700
> From: shadowrn-admin@*********.com
> [mailto:shadowrn-admin@*********.com]On Behalf Of Bull
> Sent: Friday, July 28, 2000 3:02 PM

> At 02:21 PM 7/28/00 -0700, caric wrote:
> >
> >Ahhh well at least we'll be twapped in good company.
> >
> >Caric-the-"HEY-that's-my-chair-Bull!"-shaman
> >
> hey Caric, hand me some Dew and some Pixie Sticks, and the
> cahir is yours.
> Otherwise... I'm bigger than you :]

Keep the chair, I have no desire to be on the business end of a Bull
sugar high. :)

~Caric
Message no. 4
From: Spike spike1@****.freenet.co.uk
Subject: [OT uh, duh]RE: Raiders of the Lost Woodchuck
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2000 21:14:56 +0100 (BST)
And verily, didst caric babble thusly...
> Hmmmmm, well the problem that we are running into here is that most of
> the original culprits are lumped together in the same place. One well
> placed carp and we're all done for.

It's not the Carp you should be worried about... We all know that the Stairs
have been fitted with the best anti-carp shielding ever... It's carp
proof... (the protection is less for other dead piscene lifeforms however,
so what we should all be afraid of, is the dreaded *THWUP* of a wet
Haddock...)

--
______________________________________________________________________________
| spike1@*******.co.uk | "Are you pondering what I'm pondering Pinky?" |
|Andrew Halliwell BSc(hons)| |
| in | "I think so brain, but this time, you control |
| Computer Science | the Encounter suit, and I'll do the voice..." |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Message no. 5
From: Josh Harrison mataxes@****.net
Subject: [OT uh, duh]RE: Raiders of the Lost Woodchuck
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2000 16:39:18 -0400
----- Original Message -----
From: Spike <spike1@****.freenet.co.uk>
> It's not the Carp you should be worried about... We all know that the
Stairs
> have been fitted with the best anti-carp shielding ever... It's carp
> proof... (the protection is less for other dead piscene lifeforms however,
> so what we should all be afraid of, is the dreaded *THWUP* of a wet
> Haddock...)

And of course, it won't be too much trouble for me to chop down the door
with my rating 8 herring...

-- Josh

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about [OT uh, duh]RE: Raiders of the Lost Woodchuck, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!