Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Luke Kendall <luke@********.CANON.OZ.AU>
Subject: OZ sourcebook
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1993 11:27:17 +1000
>> ... So that Oz
>> society becomes Aboriginal in structure, with white-anglo-saxons
>> very much second class citizens.

> Interesting, but how's this for a bit extra: You know how most of Oz
> population is based in the East Coast (and bits in SW WA, Tassie, etc),
> perhaps these are still controlled by w-a-saxons (plus perhaps bits of
> central NSW, VIC and QLD), and the rest is claimed by the Aborigines.
> This separation could have been a violent period, with the Oz government
> losing out in a big way.

Certainly the city sprawl would be mainly along the east coast, and
certainly this is the area that most w-a-saxons would live. I see
the Aboriginals basically as the upper class, with Aboriginal cultural
ideals as the culture of the upper class. Just because they're
Aboriginal doesn't mean they don't have hi-tech - I see them as
`owning' and controlling the tech. Part of the reason is that in
Australia, the land won't tolerate certain types of industrial
activity. Or perhaps that's just the Aboriginals's `line', to keep
us white folk under control... :-)

You can _bet_ that the changeover would have been violent.

> An advantage to this idea is that you can have hi-tech, city areas that
> the runners live-in, plus a wild, magical outback controlled and restored
> by Aboriginal magic. Within this area, the w-a-saxons could be second
> class citizens.

I can still have hi-tech anyway, and yet any runners from overseas
would have to worry about subtly different cultural `mores' at all
times, not just when they're in the outback. The outback magic
wouldn't be so much `wild', as primeval and threatening. Until you
do something wrong, anyway...

> I think though that it would perhaps be better highlighting a human vs
> metahuman racial problem, rather than playing with current human races.

I appreciate that the metahuman aspect lets people write about racism
in a way which doesn't upset anyone. I feel equal to the challenge of
dealing with a real racial issue without being offensive.

> Perhaps the militant Aborigines in the outback are dark elves?

I'm afraid I don't like the idea of relegating Aboriginals to the
role of dark elves in the outback. Or were you jesting, forsooth?
Message no. 2
From: John Fox <johnf@*****.EDU>
Subject: OZ sourcebook
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1993 01:00:50 -0500
I am posting this message for anyone developing material for Australia. I
know of at least two references to Australia in Shodwrun products. First
off, the beginning of the novel Find Your Own Truth took place in the
outback. Secondly, the Rigger Black Book has a really mean drone made by
some company called Commonwealth Aerospace. The interesting thing is that
the text mentions Australia is fighting a war with New Guinea. Now, does
trying to reclaim the old protectorate seem like something an Aboriginal
government would do? Also, I think by 2050 Australia would have a very
large Asian population.

John Fox
johnf@*****.edu
Message no. 3
From: Christopher Bellovary <bellovar@***.WISC.EDU>
Subject: Re: Oz sourcebook
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1993 23:40:11 CDT
Hi folks:

I just accidentally ran across the editor of the Australian
Sourcebook. Some Australian Shadowrun club is writing it (they have
a big fancy name I can't recall) he didn't get the chance to say much
before we were cut off, but the Australian/New Zealand war will not be
in the sourcebook.... they didn't like Hume's idea there. Of course,
FASA might put it in when they edit it, but I somehow doubt that.
The editor is also the guy who submitted the pictured for the
two australian vehicles in the RBB.... Tell ya more if we cross lines
again....

-- CrossFire --

*Geez, life's quirks can be amusing* =)

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about OZ sourcebook, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.