Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Brian Moore <mooreb@*****.FAC.COM>
Subject: PADS and Centering Foci
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 1998 15:53:48 -0400
Ereskanti <Ereskanti@***.COM> said:
>
> In a message dated 4/20/98 5:58:06 PM US Eastern Standard Time,
> mc23@**********.COM writes:
>
> > Of course it has been a while since I've been in a flame war...
> > Physical Adepts and Force points anyone? B>]#
> >
> Only -IF- we get to include Power Foci for PADS also...

Speaking of PADS and Foci, do other people allow PADS to use Centering Foci?
It seems reasonable, but I seem to remember that they can only use Weapon
Foci according to the rules.

P.S. Please ignore if this is another flame war topic.

--
Brian Moore, mooreb@***.com | I wrote up a nice script to truncate all News&
First Albany Corp. Sysadmin | Mail sigs that are greater than 4 lines long.
standard disclaimers apply | It is still in beta testing due to an off-by-
Message no. 2
From: Ereskanti <Ereskanti@***.COM>
Subject: Re: PADS and Centering Foci
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 1998 20:13:56 EDT
In a message dated 4/21/98 2:54:50 PM US Eastern Standard Time,
mooreb@*****.FAC.COM writes:

> Speaking of PADS and Foci, do other people allow PADS to use Centering Foci?
> It seems reasonable, but I seem to remember that they can only use Weapon
> Foci according to the rules.
>
I won't treat this as a flamable question. I don't see any problems with
letting a PAD using a Centering Foci, but then that's just me.

-K
Message no. 3
From: MC23 <mc23@**********.COM>
Subject: Re: PADS and Centering Foci
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 1998 23:42:56 -0400
Once upon a time, Brian Moore wrote;

>Speaking of PADS and Foci, do other people allow PADS to use Centering Foci?
>It seems reasonable, but I seem to remember that they can only use Weapon
>Foci according to the rules.

I don't acknowledge any Centering Foci.

>P.S. Please ignore if this is another flame war topic.

It's not yet.

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

"When _I_ use a word," Humpty Dumpty said, in a rather scornful
tone, "it means just what I choose it to mean - neither more nor less."
-Through the Looking Glass

I am MC23
Message no. 4
From: Brett Borger <bxb121@***.EDU>
Subject: Re: PADS and Centering Foci
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 1998 08:59:52 +0000
> Speaking of PADS and Foci, do other people allow PADS to use Centering Foci?
> It seems reasonable, but I seem to remember that they can only use Weapon
> Foci according to the rules.
>
> P.S. Please ignore if this is another flame war topic.

Well, I don't think this is a flame topic, so long as you acknowledge
the existence of centering foci :)

Awakenings blantantly states that PhysAds can only use weapon and
centering foci. It wasn't mentioned before Awakenings, as centering
foci didn't exist before then.

-=SwiftOne=-
Brett Borger
SwiftOne@***.edu
AAP Techie
Message no. 5
From: Airwasp <Airwasp@***.COM>
Subject: Re: PADS and Centering Foci
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 1998 10:04:23 EDT
In a message dated 4/21/98 7:54:48 PM !!!First Boot!!!, mooreb@*****.FAC.COM
writes:

> Speaking of PADS and Foci, do other people allow PADS to use Centering Foci?
> It seems reasonable, but I seem to remember that they can only use Weapon
> Foci according to the rules.

We allow PADS to use them here in the home game, as it is something that is a
viable option for them to use. Also, since the introduction of some powers
(like Distance Strike) have a range based on the PADS magic attribute would
you allow a PAD to have a power foci to extend the range of that power (s) ?

> P.S. Please ignore if this is another flame war topic.

So far it does not seem like something to be flamed, unless the PAD has a fire
orientation with regards to their magic and it's manifestation. :)


Mike

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about PADS and Centering Foci, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.