Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: JAD wraith@************.com
Subject: Path Questions?
Date: Sun, 30 May 1999 03:06:09 -0500
I was checking out MitS today (Yes, I've had it for a while, just got
around to posting some of the questions I have :)

After some talk on #Shadowrun...Elemental Mages (pg17 MitS) As
I'm reading it, they get a +2 for Spirits and Spells of their type, and -
1 for the opposite type (Fire/Water, etc). Now, do they cast other
spells normally, or ?

Second: Path Magicians...any drawbacks other then those stated
(I don't know if there ARE any stated) other then just being mostly
likely and Elf and from Tir Na Nog?

Observation: Some of the rules seem to bring up ALOT more
questions...almost more of a RP guide in some cases then actual
RULES. More Awakenings then Grimmy2 at times.

Maelwys
Message no. 2
From: Ereskanti@***.com Ereskanti@***.com
Subject: Path Questions?
Date: Sun, 30 May 1999 05:39:35 EDT
In a message dated 5/30/1999 3:04:28 AM US Eastern Standard Time,
wraith@************.com writes:

> After some talk on #Shadowrun...Elemental Mages (pg17 MitS) As
> I'm reading it, they get a +2 for Spirits and Spells of their type, and -
> 1 for the opposite type (Fire/Water, etc). Now, do they cast other
> spells normally, or ?

Yes, they cast other categories of spells normally.

> Second: Path Magicians...any drawbacks other then those stated
> (I don't know if there ARE any stated) other then just being mostly
> likely and Elf and from Tir Na Nog?

In MitS, no, that's it. In the Tir Na nOg sourcebook is the original
information.

> Observation: Some of the rules seem to bring up ALOT more
> questions...almost more of a RP guide in some cases then actual
> RULES. More Awakenings then Grimmy2 at times.

Yes, in some ways, I could agree there.

-K

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Path Questions?, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!