Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Damion Milliken <adm82@***.EDU.AU>
Subject: Re: Penetration vs Damage
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 1995 22:10:52 +1000
Paul Jonathan Adam writes:

> Think I missed those due to mailer troubles a few dats back. I keep trying
> on and off to split Power into 'Power' and 'Penetration': there's a big
> difference.

What Quicksilver proposed made sense to me, he re-did the Power of the
weapon to represent the armour piercing capabilties of the weapon, and
changed the Damage Category to make it the "power" of the weapon.

--
Damion Milliken University of Wollongong E-mail: adm82@***.edu.au

(GEEK CODE 2.1) GE -d+@ H s++:-- !g p0 !au a18 w+ v(?) C++ US++>+++ P+ L !3
E? N K- W M@ !V po@ Y+ t+ 5 !j R+(++) G(+)('''') !tv(--@)
b++ D B? e+ u@ h* f+ !r n----(--)@ !y+

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Penetration vs Damage, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.