From: | Damion Milliken <adm82@***.EDU.AU> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Penetration vs Damage |
Date: | Wed, 15 Mar 1995 22:10:52 +1000 |
> Think I missed those due to mailer troubles a few dats back. I keep trying
> on and off to split Power into 'Power' and 'Penetration': there's a big
> difference.
What Quicksilver proposed made sense to me, he re-did the Power of the
weapon to represent the armour piercing capabilties of the weapon, and
changed the Damage Category to make it the "power" of the weapon.
--
Damion Milliken University of Wollongong E-mail: adm82@***.edu.au
(GEEK CODE 2.1) GE -d+@ H s++:-- !g p0 !au a18 w+ v(?) C++ US++>+++ P+ L !3
E? N K- W M@ !V po@ Y+ t+ 5 !j R+(++) G(+)('''') !tv(--@)
b++ D B? e+ u@ h* f+ !r n----(--)@ !y+